vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on cushioning and breathability, Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, wins on price and style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers better comfort and value, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 provides a more secure fit. Overall, the ASICS model is the better choice for budget-conscious runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Price

ASICS is $10.05 cheaper

Cushioning

ASICS has advanced cushioning technology

Breathability

ASICS features a breathable mesh upper

Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better

Sales Rank

Nike has a better sales rank

Brand Reputation

Nike is a more recognized brand

Fit Technology

Nike uses Flywire for better foot security

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
85
Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkNike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
BrandASICSNike
Sales Rank23521650
Cushioning TechFF BLAST PLUSFoam
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshStandard
Outsole TypeFLUIDRIDEHeel Overlay

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkNike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are about 12% cheaper than the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes. The ASICS model retails for $74.95, while the Nike option is priced at $85.00. This difference of $10.05 could be a significant factor for budget-conscious shoppers. Despite the price disparity, both shoes offer features that appeal to runners, making them worthy of consideration in different contexts.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort and cushioning, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 excels with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning technology. This midsole foam delivers a blend of cloud-like cushioning and a responsive ride, making it suitable for longer runs or extended periods of wear. Additionally, the shoe incorporates AMPLIFOAM PLUS technology, providing a soft and comfortable ride. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3 also offers foam cushioning, but it does not specify the advanced cushioning technologies found in the ASICS pair. Therefore, for runners prioritizing comfort, the ASICS model appears to have an edge.

Fit and Support

Fit is a crucial aspect of running shoes, and both models incorporate technologies aimed at providing support. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability while reducing the need for additional overlays. This design can help ensure a snug fit without compromising comfort. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 employs Flywire cables that secure the foot when the laces are tightened, delivering excellent stability. While both shoes offer unique fitting solutions, the ASICS model leans towards a more breathable design, which may benefit warmer weather runs.

Weight and Breathability

When it comes to weight and breathability, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is designed with a lightweight engineered mesh upper, which not only contributes to its overall weight but also enhances airflow to keep feet cooler during runs. Although the specific weights of both shoes aren’t provided, the emphasis on breathability in the ASICS model suggests it may be a better choice for hot weather or long-distance runs. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, while also a running shoe, does not highlight breathability in its features, indicating that runners may experience different levels of comfort based on environmental conditions.

Durability and Outsole

Durability is essential for running shoes, and both pairs come with features aimed at enhancing longevity. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features a FLUIDRIDE outsole designed to create smoother strides, which can contribute to reducing wear over time. Meanwhile, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 has a heel overlay for added security, which may help enhance its durability in high-stress areas. While both shoes offer durable components, the ASICS model's focus on stride smoothness may lead to better overall performance during runs.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 comes in a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow colorway, appealing to those looking for a pop of color in their running gear. Conversely, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 features a more classic color combination of White/Black-Pearl Pink-Peony, which may appeal to runners who prefer a more understated look. While aesthetic preferences are subjective, both models offer distinct styles that cater to different tastes, making them visually appealing options for various runners.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The Nike Women's Run Swift 3 holds a better sales rank, currently sitting at 1650 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 at 2352. This indicates that the Nike model may be more popular among consumers, potentially due to brand loyalty or specific marketing efforts. However, a lower sales rank does not necessarily reflect product quality, as individual preferences and needs vary greatly among runners. It's worth considering that while popularity can indicate consumer satisfaction, personal fit and comfort should always be prioritized.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize comfort and cushioning at a lower price point, the ASICS model is the better choice, offering advanced cushioning technologies and a breathable design. However, if brand reputation and a slightly more secure fit are essential to you, the Nike model might be worth the extra cost. Consider what features matter most to you, and make your decision based on personal preferences and running style.