vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on sales rank and price, Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10 wins on weight.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers superior cushioning and a better sales rank, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 is more budget-friendly. Choose based on your priorities.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced FF BLAST PLUS and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning.

Sales Rank

ASICS has a better sales rank at 2,352.

Design

ASICS offers a vibrant color scheme.

Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10 is better

Price

Saucony is priced lower at $54.63.

Weight

Saucony is lightweight and comfortable.

Versatility

Saucony is suitable for various activities.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
85
Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkSaucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10
BrandASICSSaucony
Cushioning TechFF BLAST PLUSVERSARUN
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshBreathable Mesh
OutsoleFLUIDRIDERubber
FitComfortableSecure

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkSaucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker is the more budget-friendly option, retailing at $54.63. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, making them about 37% more expensive than the Saucony model. For runners looking to save on their next footwear purchase, the Saucony sneaker presents a significant price advantage without compromising on quality.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features advanced cushioning technologies, including FF BLAST PLUS and AMPLIFOAM PLUS, designed to deliver a softer, more responsive ride. These technologies aim to enhance overall comfort, making it suitable for longer runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 incorporates VERSARUN cushioning, which also prioritizes comfort by absorbing impact and reducing pressure. While both shoes emphasize cushioning, ASICS's technologies may provide a slightly more luxurious feel, ideal for those who prioritize a plush running experience.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes offer a stylish and functional look, but they cater to different tastes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 comes in a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow color scheme, which may appeal to those who enjoy a bold aesthetic. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 in Mist/Indigo offers a more subdued and versatile appearance, making it easier to match with various outfits. Ultimately, the choice here will depend on personal style preferences, but both options are aesthetically pleasing in their own right.

Breathability and Fit

Both running shoes are designed with breathability in mind, but they utilize different materials to achieve this. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that promotes airflow and reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing the overall fit. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 also boasts a light and breathable mesh upper, ensuring that each step remains fresh and cool. Given their similar emphasis on breathability, users may find both options comfortable for extended wear, but ASICS's design may provide a slight edge for those prioritizing reduced overlays.

Outsole Performance

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is equipped with a FLUIDRIDE outsole, which helps create smoother strides. This design aims to enhance the overall running experience by providing better ground contact and traction. In comparison, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 features a rubber outsole that takes cues from trusted styles, ensuring a smooth feel and durability for long distances. While both outsoles are designed for performance, the ASICS model may offer a more advanced technology that could benefit runners looking for a seamless transition during their runs.

Weight and Versatility

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is crafted for underfoot comfort and versatility, making it suitable for both running and fitness routines. Its layered AMPLIFOAM PLUS technology not only enhances comfort but also maintains a lightweight feel. While the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 is also designed to provide comfort and a secure fit, it may not emphasize versatility as much as the ASICS model. For those who plan to use their shoes for various activities beyond running, the Gel-Excite 11 may be the better choice.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of sales rank, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 holds a better position at 2,352, compared to the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16, which ranks at 22,129. This suggests that the ASICS model is more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting its quality and performance. Buyers who consider popularity as a factor in their purchasing decisions may lean towards the ASICS shoes, feeling assured by the confidence of a higher sales rank.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker will hinge on individual preferences and budget. The ASICS model offers advanced cushioning technologies, a vibrant design, and a better sales rank, but comes at a higher price of $74.95. In contrast, the Saucony sneaker provides excellent value at $54.63, with solid comfort features and a versatile look. For budget-conscious shoppers or those new to running, the Saucony may be the way to go, while seasoned runners seeking enhanced performance might prefer the ASICS.