ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8
Updated August 2026 — Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 leads on weight and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers great comfort and affordability, while the Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 excels in performance and speed.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Price
ASICS is $74.95, significantly cheaper than Saucony's $130.66.
Comfort
ASICS features superior cushioning technologies.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 2,352.
Why Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 is better
Performance
Saucony is designed for competitive running.
Technology
Saucony includes advanced features like a carbon plate.
Speed
Saucony is optimized for race day performance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark | Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Excite 11 | Endorphin Pro 4 |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS | PWRRUN PB |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Synthetic |
| Outsole | FLUIDRIDE | SPEEDROLL |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, making them about 43% cheaper than the Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, which costs $130.66. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. The ASICS model offers a compelling entry point into the running shoe market, while the Saucony model, despite its higher price, may justify the investment with advanced performance features.
Brand Overview
ASICS and Saucony are both reputable brands within the running shoe industry, but they cater to slightly different markets. ASICS is known for its focus on comfort and cushioning, evident in the Gel-Excite 11's use of FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies. In contrast, Saucony emphasizes performance and speed with the Endorphin Pro 4, featuring components like the carbon plate and SPEEDROLL technology. This essential distinction highlights the design philosophies of each brand, catering to different types of runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 stands out with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and AMPLIFOAM PLUS midsole, designed for a plush, responsive ride. The shoe's engineered mesh upper adds to its breathability, making it suitable for longer runs. The Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4, while also designed for comfort, prioritizes speed with its PWRRUN PB cushioning and carbon plate, providing a snappy feel for race day. Thus, while both shoes offer comfort, they serve different purposes based on the runner's needs.
Technology and Innovation
The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 incorporates several innovative technologies like PureGEL, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, enhancing the cushioning experience. The FLUIDRIDE outsole contributes to smoother strides, making it a great option for everyday runners. On the other hand, the Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 includes advanced features such as PWRRUN HG and a carbon plate that enhance performance. This technological edge may appeal to competitive runners looking for a race-ready shoe, whereas the ASICS model is tailored for versatility and comfort.
Performance and Stability
In terms of performance, the Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 is designed for speed and efficiency, making it ideal for competitive runs. Its sales rank of 13,551 suggests a solid presence in the market, particularly among serious athletes. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a better sales rank at 2,352, indicating its popularity among casual runners who prioritize comfort and stability over sheer speed. This performance distinction may influence a buyer’s choice depending on their running goals.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetically, both shoes offer appealing designs but cater to different tastes. The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 features a vibrant dark pink and orange color scheme that stands out, appealing to those who prefer a bold look. Meanwhile, the Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 comes in a more subdued mirage/citron combination, reflecting a sleek, performance-oriented style. The choice of design will depend on personal preferences, but both brands have succeeded in creating visually appealing running shoes.
Target Audience
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is well-suited for casual runners and fitness enthusiasts who value comfort and affordability. Its features make it an excellent choice for those just starting their running journey or those looking for a reliable everyday sneaker. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 targets competitive runners seeking high-performance footwear that enhances speed and efficiency. Thus, the target audience for each shoe is distinctly different, influencing purchasing decisions.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker ultimately depends on your running style and budget. If you prioritize comfort and a lower price point, the ASICS model at $74.95 is a fantastic choice, offering solid cushioning and a versatile design. However, if you're a competitive runner looking for cutting-edge technology and performance, the Saucony model at $130.66 may be worth the investment despite its higher cost. Both shoes serve their respective markets well, catering to different needs in the realm of running footwear.

