ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is priced at $74.95, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 comes in at $54.95. This means the Under Armour model is about 27% cheaper than the ASICS model. If budget is your primary concern, the Charged Assert 10 offers a more economical choice without sacrificing quality. However, the price difference may reflect varying features and technologies that could influence your running experience.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort and cushioning, both models excel but in different ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, designed to provide a cloud-like feel while maintaining a responsive ride. It also incorporates AMPLIFOAM PLUS, which adds to the overall comfort. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 utilizes Charged Cushioning, which is compression molded for responsiveness and durability. This model also includes an EVA sockliner for added comfort. Therefore, if you prioritize a plush feel, the ASICS may be the better option, while the Under Armour focuses on responsiveness.

Upper Material and Breathability

Breathability is a critical factor in running shoes, and both models address this effectively. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that is lightweight and helps reduce the need for additional overlays, enhancing breathability. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 also boasts a lightweight, breathable mesh upper, complemented by synthetic overlays that add durability and support. Both are designed to keep your feet cool during runs, but the ASICS may offer a slight edge in terms of weight and reduced overlays.

Outsole Design

The outsoles of the two shoes are tailored for different needs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 comes with a FLUIDRIDE outsole that aims to create smoother strides, enhancing your running efficiency. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 features a solid rubber outsole that covers high-impact zones, providing greater durability while keeping the weight down. This design is particularly beneficial for runners who frequently tackle varied terrains. If you’re looking for a shoe that promotes smooth transitions, the ASICS may be preferable; however, for durability, the Under Armour is a strong contender.

Weight

Weight can significantly affect your running performance, and both models have differing weights. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 weighs 8.9 oz, making it a lightweight option that can enhance speed and agility. The weight of the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 isn't specified, but its focus on cushioning might suggest it is slightly heavier. If you prefer a lighter shoe for faster runs, the Under Armour is likely the better choice.

Versatility

Both shoes cater to a variety of running styles, but they have nuances that may sway your decision. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is designed for versatility in running and fitness routines, making it suitable for more than just runs. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is labeled as a neutral shoe, which is ideal for runners requiring flexibility and cushioning. If you plan to use the shoes for multi-purpose activities beyond running, the ASICS may offer more adaptability.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

In terms of brand reputation, both ASICS and Under Armour have established themselves in the athletic footwear market. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a bestseller rank of 2352, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 ranks at 5952. A lower sales rank often indicates higher popularity, suggesting that the ASICS may have a slightly stronger following among consumers. However, brand preference can be subjective, and both brands are known for producing quality running shoes.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 should hinge on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize cushioning and a versatile design for various activities, the ASICS model is a solid choice, albeit at a higher price point. Conversely, if budget, lightweight construction, and durability are your main concerns, the Under Armour model stands out as the more economical option. Each shoe has its strengths, making them both excellent choices in the running shoes category.