vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, leads on stability and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 offers superior stability and cushioning for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better

Stability

4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability for distance training.

Cushioning

FF BLAST PLUS ECO provides advanced cushioning.

Brand Reputation

ASICS is known for high-performance running shoes.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper.

Weight

New Balance offers a lighter feel for casual runs.

Versatility

New Balance is suitable for everyday wear.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
70

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
CushioningFF BLAST PLUS ECOFresh Foam
Upper MaterialEngineered meshMolded mesh
WeightLightweightUltra-lightweight
Fit FeaturesKnit heel pull tabLace closure
Target UseDistance trainingCasual running

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe comes at a significantly lower price of $72.24. This means the New Balance shoe is about 42% cheaper than the ASICS model. The price difference could be a major factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes offer great features for runners, the price point of the New Balance model makes it an attractive option for those on a budget.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 features FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning and Rearfoot PureGEL technology designed to provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This advanced cushioning system aims to create a smooth running experience, especially beneficial for longer distances. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes Fresh Foam midsole cushioning that is precision engineered for an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. Both shoes excel in comfort, but the ASICS may offer more specialized technology for serious runners focusing on distance.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 presents a stylish design available in Coffee/NOVA Orange, appealing to those looking for a trendy shoe. Its engineered mesh upper enhances breathability, providing a sleek look alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper, though it does not specify color options in the data. While both shoes prioritize comfort and style, the ASICS model may attract consumers who value a more distinctive color scheme.

Breathability and Fit

Both shoes prioritize breathability, but they approach it differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 employs an engineered mesh upper designed to improve airflow, which is crucial for maintaining comfort during intense runs. Similarly, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper that also supports comfort. However, the ASICS model includes a knit heel pull tab for easier on and off, which could enhance the fit and convenience for users. The additional features in the ASICS shoe may appeal to those looking for a tailored fit.

Stability Features

Stability is a key consideration for runners, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels in this area with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM feature. This technology helps create adaptive stability, promoting a balanced stride during distance training. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses more on cushioning and comfort, lacking the specialized stability features found in the ASICS model. Runners who require additional support may find the ASICS shoe to be a superior option due to its advanced stability technologies.

Performance in Running Conditions

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is designed for distance training, making it ideal for runners who log significant miles. Its combination of cushioning and stability features is tailored to enhance performance over longer distances. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9, while also suitable for running, is more focused on delivering comfort for shorter runs or casual exercise. The ASICS shoe's higher sales rank at 26,176 indicates it is a popular choice among serious runners, while the New Balance model, with a rank of 13,435, may appeal more to casual runners.

Brand Reputation

Both ASICS and New Balance are well-respected brands in the running shoe market. ASICS is often associated with high-performance running and stability features, appealing to dedicated athletes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 reflects this reputation with its advanced technologies aimed at serious runners. Conversely, New Balance is known for its comfort and versatility, making the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 an excellent choice for everyday wear and casual runners. Each brand caters to different segments of the market, which may influence consumer preferences.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 depends on your running needs and budget. If you're a serious runner seeking advanced stability and cushioning for long distances, the ASICS model, priced at $124.95, may be the better choice despite its higher cost. However, if you're looking for a more economical option that still offers comfort for casual runs, the New Balance model at $72.24 is a solid, budget-friendly alternative. Consider your running habits and preferences when making your decision.