ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on support and fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in support and stability, while the Brooks Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and comfort at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Support
Gel-Kayano provides enhanced stability for long-distance running.
Technology
Rearfoot PureGEL technology offers superior shock absorption.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates popularity among serious runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Glycerin is more budget-friendly at $114.95.
Cushioning
DNA Tuned technology provides luxurious cushioning.
Versatility
Glycerin is suitable for various athletic activities.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Glycerin 22 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Double Jacquard Knit |
| Technology | Rearfoot PureGEL | DNA Tuned |
Dimension comparison
Brand Overview
ASICS and Brooks are both renowned brands in the running shoe industry, each offering unique features in their footwear designs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are positioned as high-support shoes ideal for long-distance running, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe emphasizes cushioning and comfort for various athletic activities. ASICS has a bestseller rank of 3,805, while Brooks boasts a significantly lower rank of 844, indicating its popularity in the market.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is available for $114.95. This makes the Gel-Kayano approximately 34% more expensive than the Glycerin. If budget is a significant factor for you, the Glycerin offers a more economical choice without compromising on quality or performance. However, the Gel-Kayano may justify its higher price with additional features aimed at enhancing support and stability.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, both shoes have unique elements that cater to different preferences. The Gel-Kayano features a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability and comfort throughout a run. It also incorporates a knit heel pull tab for easier on-and-off wear. In contrast, the Glycerin 22 is designed with DNA Tuned technology that provides a luxurious cushioning experience and accommodates a neutral foot strike. The double jacquard knit upper ensures a flexible fit. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Gel-Kayano is more tailored for runners seeking additional support.
Technology and Features
The technology embedded in both shoes sets them apart. The ASICS Gel-Kayano utilizes a Rearfoot PureGEL technology that is 65% softer than standard GEL technology, enhancing shock absorption during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 22 features cutting-edge DNA Tuned cushioning that combines various cell sizes for plush landings and energetic toe-offs. Both shoes offer advanced technology to enhance running experiences, but the Gel-Kayano leans towards those needing more structural support, while the Glycerin focuses on cushioning.
Design and Aesthetics
Design plays a crucial role in the appeal of running shoes. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 features a lightweight, breathable mesh upper that is inspired by the colors of sunrise and sunset, making it visually striking. The Glycerin 22, available in an eye-catching white, limpet shell, and amparo blue colorway, is also designed for aesthetic appeal. Both shoes are stylish, but the Gel-Kayano's unique color inspiration may attract those looking for something different in their footwear.
Performance on Different Surfaces
The ASICS Gel-Kayano is particularly well-suited for long-distance runs on varied terrains, thanks to its stability-enhancing features. The 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION technology allows for better compression at footstrike, catering to different gait patterns. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 22 is versatile enough for road running and cross-training, providing an accommodating fit and smooth transitions. If your activities range across different platforms, the Glycerin may be a better option.
Target Audience
The ASICS Gel-Kayano is primarily targeted towards runners requiring significant support and stability, making it a solid choice for those training for long distances. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 22 is designed for a broader audience, appealing to runners, gym-goers, and those who simply value comfort. Its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe speaks to its adaptability for various users. Depending on your specific needs, one shoe may resonate more than the other.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 comes down to your personal running style and needs. If you prioritize stability and support, particularly for long-distance running, the Gel-Kayano is a worthy investment at $154.45. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that provides excellent cushioning across different activities, the Glycerin at $114.95 could be the perfect fit. Both shoes have strong merits, but understanding your requirements will guide you to the better choice.

