ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on stability and popularity, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and design.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers better stability and a lower price, while the Brooks Glycerin 23 excels in plush cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Price
ASICS is $5.54 cheaper.
Stability
Features 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank at 3,805.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning.
Fit
Plush, engineered upper for comfort.
Versatility
Designed for various running conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Glycerin 23 |
| Price | $154.45 | $159.99 |
| Sales Rank | 3,805 | 4,982 |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST™ PLUS | DNA TUNED |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, making them about 3.4% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $159.99. While the price difference may seem minor, for runners looking to save on their footwear, every dollar counts. The Gel-Kayano 32 offers a premium experience at a slightly lower cost, appealing to budget-conscious consumers without sacrificing quality.
Comfort and Fit
Both the ASICS and Brooks shoes prioritize comfort, but they achieve it through different technologies. The Gel-Kayano 32 features FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole, aimed at providing a smoother training experience. In contrast, the Glycerin 23 boasts upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning, which offers softer landings and more responsive toe-offs. Runners may prefer the Gel-Kayano's adaptive stability features, including the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, while others may be drawn to the plush, engineered upper of the Glycerin 23 that ensures a secure fit without hot spots.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 comes in a striking black and white combination, part of the SUNNY SIZZLE Collection, inspired by sunrise hues. This design not only looks appealing but is also functional, featuring a lightweight sublimated upper mesh for breathability. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, on the other hand, presents a more vibrant aesthetic with its white, phantom, and cyber pink colors. The triple jacquard warp-knit upper is not only stylish but also enhances comfort. Both shoes cater to different tastes, making the choice largely subjective.
Performance Features
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates several features aimed at enhancing stability and comfort, such as the rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. The Brooks Glycerin 23, meanwhile, focuses on delivering smooth transitions with a wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting. This ensures balanced movement and seamless heel-to-toe transitions, making it suitable for various running conditions. Runners may lean towards the Gel-Kayano for long-distance runs needing stability, while the Glycerin might appeal more to those seeking plush cushioning.
Targeted Audience
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is designed for runners requiring extra support and stability, especially during longer distances or for those with specific gait differences. Its features cater specifically to individuals looking for a shoe that can handle more excessive loads. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is tailored for neutral runners who seek a comfortable and cushioned experience during daily training or recovery runs. The Glycerin 23 is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, making it a great option for a broader audience including those with specific foot health needs.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a critical factor for runners investing in new shoes. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is built with a focus on stability and comfort, emphasizing long-lasting performance through its quality materials and design features. The Brooks Glycerin 23 also promises durability, with its premium midsole package designed to withstand high mileage. Both brands are well-respected in the running community for their longevity, though individual experiences may vary based on running style and terrain.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 has a sales rank of 3,805, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ranks slightly lower at 4,982. This suggests that the Gel-Kayano has a stronger foothold in the market, which may indicate a larger customer base or more positive reviews. For consumers, a higher sales rank can often reflect a more trusted product, as many runners rely on peer recommendations when selecting footwear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize adaptive stability and support, the Gel-Kayano 32 could be the better choice, especially at a lower price of $154.45. However, if plush cushioning and a distraction-free fit are more aligned with your running style, the Glycerin 23, despite its higher price of $159.99, offers excellent features for comfort and performance. Take into consideration your running habits, foot type, and aesthetic preferences to make the best decision for your next pair of running shoes.

