vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and fit.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better value and support, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in sustainability and cushioning.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Sustainability

ASICS uses 75% recycled materials.

Cushioning

ASICS features PureGEL technology.

Style

ASICS has a sleek design.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

Price

Brooks is $26 cheaper.

Support

Brooks has Guiderails Holistic Support System.

Popularity

Brooks has a better sales rank.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
78
Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Nimbus 27Adrenaline GTS 24
Price$124.95$98.95
Sales Rank23931047
Cushioning TechPureGELDNA Loft v3

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive Running Shoe is more affordable at $98.95, making it about 21% cheaper. This price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. Both shoes offer excellent features and technology, but if cost is a major concern, the Brooks option provides substantial savings without compromising on quality.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 utilizes PureGEL technology, designed to provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings, which is ideal for runners looking for comfort over long distances. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which promises a plush and smooth experience tailored to individual strides. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model may cater better to those needing adaptive cushioning for varied foot movements.

Support Features

Support is a key aspect for any running shoe, and both models excel in this category. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is equipped with the innovative Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps maintain natural motion paths and minimizes excess movement. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 does not explicitly mention a similar support system but emphasizes its engineered jacquard mesh upper, which wraps the foot softly. For runners who prioritize structural support, the Brooks model may have the edge.

Breathability and Upper Material

Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper. This design not only provides a soft feel but also contributes to breathability, enhancing overall comfort during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 employs an engineered air mesh upper, which is designed to deliver adequate breathability, stretch, and structure. Both shoes incorporate high-quality materials, but the choice may come down to personal feel and fit preferences.

Sustainability

Sustainability is becoming increasingly important in footwear manufacturing. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with at least 75% of its main upper material made from recycled content. Additionally, its sockliner utilizes a solution dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 does not highlight similar sustainable practices to the same extent. For environmentally conscious consumers, the ASICS model could be the more appealing choice.

Sales and Popularity

In terms of sales rank, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is positioned at 2393, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 boasts a better rank at 1047. This suggests that the Brooks model may have a greater popularity among consumers, potentially reflecting its proven performance and satisfaction. A higher bestseller rank might indicate stronger customer trust and validation, an important consideration when choosing a running shoe.

Style and Aesthetics

Style can be subjective, but both models offer distinctive looks. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features a sleek design in Black/Lake Grey, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a classic Black/Black/Ebony color scheme. Depending on personal style preferences, one might be more appealing than the other. Both shoes can easily complement various athletic outfits, but the final decision may hinge on individual taste in aesthetics.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you value sustainability and advanced cushioning, the ASICS model is a strong contender, albeit at a higher price point. However, if budget, support, and popularity are your priorities, the Brooks option presents a well-rounded choice that is about 21% cheaper. Consider your running style, comfort preferences, and budget to make the best decision for your needs.