vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on popularity and sustainability, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and fit.

The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in cushioning and sustainability, while the Brooks Trace 4 offers a budget-friendly option with solid performance. Choose based on your priorities.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning.

Sustainability

ASICS uses at least 75% recycled content in its upper.

Popularity

ASICS has a better sales rank at 2393.

Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Price

Brooks is $33.20 cheaper.

Weight

Brooks offers lightweight cushioning.

Fit

Brooks emphasizes a secure fit with its design.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
Current Price$124.95$91.75
Sales Rank239312197
Cushion TypePureGELDNA LOFT v2
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshAir Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -

Introduction to the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 and Brooks Trace 4

When it comes to running shoes, both comfort and performance are paramount. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and Brooks Women's Trace 4 are two popular options for female runners, each offering unique features. The ASICS shoe is priced at $124.95, while the Brooks model comes in at a lower price of $91.75, making it about 27% cheaper. This article will delve into various aspects of both shoes to help you determine which one might be the better choice for your running needs.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 prioritizes cushioning with its PureGEL technology, designed to provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This is complemented by FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which includes approximately 24% bio-based content for a more responsive toe-off. In contrast, the Brooks Trace 4 features DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning that adapts to individual strides, ensuring lasting comfort. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the ASICS offers a focus on eco-friendly materials, which may appeal to environmentally conscious runners.

Fit and Breathability

Both the ASICS and Brooks shoes are engineered with breathable uppers. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot softly, while the Brooks Trace 4 utilizes an engineered air mesh upper for enhanced breathability. This design in both shoes aims to keep runners dry and comfortable during long runs. However, the Brooks shoe emphasizes a secure fit, which may be crucial for those who prefer a snug feeling while running.

Sustainability Features

Sustainability is a significant consideration for many consumers today, and both brands are making strides in this area. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 includes at least 75% recycled content in its main upper material, along with a sockliner produced through a dyeing process that reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by about 45%. The Brooks Trace 4, while it uses recycled silica in its outsoles, does not emphasize sustainability to the same extent as ASICS. Therefore, if eco-friendliness is a priority for you, the ASICS shoe may be the more appealing option.

Performance and Responsiveness

In terms of performance, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is designed for lightweight cushioning and responsiveness, making it suitable for various running styles. Meanwhile, the Brooks Trace 4 focuses on smooth transitions with its segmented crash pad and sculpted grooves, which help absorb impact during runs. Both shoes cater to different performance needs, so the choice may depend on whether you prioritize cushioning (ASICS) or smooth transitions (Brooks).

Pricing and Value

The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is priced at $124.95, while the Brooks Trace 4 is more budget-friendly at $91.75. This price difference of about $33.20 makes the Brooks shoe about 27% cheaper than the ASICS model. For runners on a budget, the Brooks Trace 4 offers excellent value without sacrificing essential features, although it may lack some advanced cushioning technologies present in the ASICS shoe.

Sales and Popularity

Popularity can often indicate product reliability, and both shoes have their merits in this area. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 holds a sales rank of 2393, while the Brooks Trace 4 is positioned at a slightly lower sales rank of 12197. This suggests that the ASICS shoe is currently a more popular choice among consumers, which may influence your decision if you value trending products.

Style and Aesthetic

Both the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 and Brooks Trace 4 offer stylish designs that cater to different tastes. The ASICS shoe comes in a Black/Lake Grey color combination, while the Brooks shoe features a fresh White/Oyster/Rose aesthetic. While both options are attractive, your personal style preference will ultimately dictate which shoe you find more appealing.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Brooks Women's Trace 4 largely depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you value advanced cushioning technology and eco-friendly materials, the ASICS shoe is a strong contender, though it comes with a higher price tag. On the other hand, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that still provides comfort and a secure fit, the Brooks Trace 4 makes a compelling case. Ultimately, both shoes serve their purpose well, but your choice should align with your specific running habits and values.