vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on eco-friendliness and durability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers better value and sustainability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 provides a structured fit and advanced cushioning.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $25 cheaper

Sustainability

75% recycled materials in ASICS

Sales Rank

ASICS ranks higher at 2393

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe is better

Cushioning

New Balance has Fresh Foam X technology

Support

Structured upper in New Balance

Brand Reputation

New Balance is known for comfort

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGel-Nimbus 27Fresh Foam X 880 V15
Price$124.95$149.95
Cushioning TechPureGELFresh Foam X
Upper MaterialRecycled MeshStructured Upper

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

When comparing the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe, the ASICS model is more budget-friendly at $124.95, while the New Balance option is priced at $149.95. This makes the ASICS shoes about 17% cheaper than their New Balance counterpart. Price can be a significant factor for many runners, especially if they are looking for quality footwear without breaking the bank. Thus, if cost is a primary consideration, the ASICS running shoes stand out as the more economical choice.

Brand Reputation

Both ASICS and New Balance have established strong reputations in the running shoe market. ASICS is well-known for its commitment to innovation in cushioning and support, as evidenced by the features of the Gel-Nimbus 27. On the other hand, New Balance emphasizes the comfort of its Fresh Foam X midsole technology. While ASICS ranks at 2393 in sales, New Balance is positioned slightly lower at 6878. This difference in bestseller rank might suggest that ASICS is currently favored among consumers, potentially due to its effective performance and price point.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning for softer landings. It also includes FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, aimed at delivering responsive toe-offs and a more comfortable running experience. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 is designed with Fresh Foam X midsole foam that promises an incredibly cushioned experience, enhanced by a structured upper for added support. While both shoes focus on comfort, the ASICS model offers a dual-layer cushioning system that may appeal to runners seeking a softer feel underfoot.

Environmental Considerations

Sustainability is a noteworthy aspect of the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27, as at least 75% of its upper material is made from recycled content. Additionally, the sockliner is produced using a dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 incorporates approximately 3% bio-based content in its midsole foam, indicating a commitment to sustainable practices, though to a lesser extent than ASICS. For environmentally-conscious consumers, the ASICS shoes present a more compelling option due to their larger percentage of recycled materials and eco-friendly production methods.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a striking Black/Lake Grey color scheme, which many may find appealing for its versatility. The engineered jacquard mesh upper not only wraps the foot comfortably but also adds a modern aesthetic. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15, while also stylish, has a more structured appearance, which may appeal to those looking for traditional athletic footwear. Design preferences can be subjective, but both models offer a unique look that caters to various tastes.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is offered in size 8.5, making it suitable for many runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 does not specify a size in the provided information. However, New Balance often provides a range of sizes accommodating different foot shapes. Fit is crucial for running shoes, as an improper fit can lead to discomfort and injury. If you have specific size needs, checking the full sizing options for each shoe will be essential, but ASICS does offer a known fit with its current listing.

Performance for Runners

Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 are designed for performance, but they cater to slightly different running styles. The ASICS model, with its advanced cushioning technology, is particularly suitable for runners who prioritize soft landings and responsiveness. In contrast, the New Balance shoe offers a structured upper with fresh foam cushioning, making it ideal for those who prefer a balanced, supportive feel during their runs. Your choice may depend on your running style and preference for cushioning versus support.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe hinges on your specific needs as a runner. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option with excellent cushioning and a commitment to sustainability, the ASICS model is the clear winner at $124.95. However, if you prioritize a structured fit and the latest in cushioning technology, the New Balance option may be worth the extra cost at $149.95. Both are strong contenders, but the ASICS shoes offer a more appealing value overall.