vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on comfort and cushioning, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running wins on weight and style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers better value and sustainability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 excels in lightweight design.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $35 cheaper than New Balance

Sustainability

ASICS uses 75% recycled materials

Sales Rank

ASICS ranks 2393, higher than New Balance's 25188

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running is better

Weight

New Balance is lighter at 241 grams

Design

New Balance has a stylish colorway

Fit

New Balance features a gusseted tongue for better lockdown

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running
Cushion TypePureGEL & FF BLAST PLUS ECOFresh Foam X
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshSynthetic
Reflective DetailsNoYes
Closure TypeMesh UpperLace
Eco-FriendlyYesNo

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running Shoe costs $159.95. This makes the ASICS model about 22% cheaper than the New Balance option. If budget is a primary concern, the ASICS shoes provide a more economical choice without significantly compromising on quality or features. Both shoes are designed for comfort and performance, but the price difference may influence your decision, especially if you're looking to maximize your investment in running footwear.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer distinctive cushioning technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features PureGEL technology, which is designed to provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Additionally, it incorporates FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which includes about 24% bio-based content, promoting a responsive toe-off. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 utilizes a Fresh Foam X midsole that delivers an exceptionally cushioned experience. Therefore, if maximum comfort is your priority, both options excel, but the ASICS may offer a slightly more eco-friendly approach with its bio-based materials.

Weight and Breathability

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 is a lightweight option, weighing only 241 grams (8.5 oz), which makes it ideal for long runs where every ounce matters. It also features a breathable design, enhancing comfort during extended use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27, while not specified in weight, is designed with an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot with a soft feel. Though specific weight details for the ASICS are missing, the lightweight nature of the New Balance shoe may appeal to those seeking minimalism in their running shoes.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Lake Grey color scheme, which is versatile and suitable for various outfits. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 presents a lighter Sea Salt/Lab Green/Frosted Glass colorway that stands out. Your choice may depend on personal style preferences, but both shoes maintain a contemporary aesthetic that can transition from the track to casual wear.

Sustainability Efforts

Sustainability is a key focus for the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27, which is made from at least 75% recycled materials in its upper and utilizes a dyeing process that conserves water and reduces carbon emissions. In contrast, while the New Balance shoe does not emphasize sustainability in its features, it offers a comfortable running experience. If environmental impact matters to you, the ASICS model clearly positions itself as the more sustainable option.

Performance and Versatility

Both running shoes are designed to cater to various running needs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 ranks 2393 in sales, indicating a solid reputation among runners who appreciate its cushioning and support. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 ranks 25188, suggesting it may be less popular but still a viable option for those seeking comfort and versatility. The ASICS shoe appears to offer a more established performance track record, which might sway serious runners looking for reliable footwear.

Fit and Closure

Fit is another critical factor for runners, and both shoes employ different closure mechanisms. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 wraps the foot comfortably, thanks to its engineered jacquard mesh upper. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 features a lace closure system and a gusseted tongue that ensures a secure lockdown fit. If a customizable fit is essential to you, the lace closure of the New Balance may provide a more tailored experience.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 ultimately comes down to personal priorities. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that emphasizes sustainability and established comfort, the ASICS model is the way to go. However, if you prioritize lightweight design and a potentially more stylish appearance, the New Balance shoe may meet your needs. Both shoes offer excellent features for runners, so weigh these factors carefully to find the perfect match for your running lifestyle.