ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on support and breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers advanced cushioning and eco-friendly features, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 provides maximum comfort at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Sustainability
Made with recycled materials
Cushioning
PureGEL technology for softer landings
Popularity
Higher sales rank indicates better reputation
Why Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 is better
Price
Cheaper by approximately 15%
Comfort
MAX CUSHIONING for profound protection
Design
Vibrant color scheme appeals to some users
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Hurricane 24 |
| Price | $124.95 | $106.61 |
| Sales Rank | 2393 | 21932 |
| Cushioning Tech | PureGEL | PWRRUN PB |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and Saucony Women's Hurricane 24
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is priced at $124.95, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is about 15% cheaper at $106.61. Both shoes are designed for runners, but they cater to slightly different preferences in terms of cushioning and support. The Gel-Nimbus 27 focuses on sustainability and advanced cushioning technologies, whereas the Hurricane 24 emphasizes maximum comfort through its innovative design.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features a sophisticated black and lake grey color scheme, presenting a sleek and modern look. Its engineered jacquard mesh upper wraps the foot in a soft feel, which not only adds to its aesthetic appeal but also enhances comfort. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 comes in a bright white and foam color, offering a more vibrant appearance. Its design is also aimed at maximum cushioning, which is visually represented by its robust profile. Both shoes are designed to be eye-catching, but they appeal to different style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is equipped with PureGEL technology that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This feature is ideal for runners looking for a shoe that reduces impact during long runs. The Saucony Women's Hurricane 24, meanwhile, is described as "insanely comfortable" with its MAX CUSHIONING and PWRRUN PB technology, making it suitable for those seeking profound protection and support. While both shoes offer excellent comfort, the Gel-Nimbus 27 focuses on a lighter feel, whereas the Hurricane 24 prioritizes maximum cushioning.
Technologies and Innovations
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 employs advanced technologies aimed at sustainability. Notably, at least 75% of its main upper material is made with recycled content, and the sockliner uses a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage by approximately 33%. This commitment to the environment is a significant innovation for eco-conscious consumers. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 utilizes CENTER PATH TECHNOLOGY, which enhances stability during runs. While both shoes are high-tech, the Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out for its eco-friendly initiatives.
Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a sales rank of 2393, which indicates that it is quite popular among consumers, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 has a lower sales rank of 21932. This difference suggests that the Gel-Nimbus 27 may have a better reputation for performance among runners. The PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning in the Gel-Nimbus 27 work together to provide a responsive experience, making it suitable for longer distances. The Hurricane 24, with its maximum cushioning, excels in comfort but may not deliver the same level of responsiveness.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 retails for $124.95, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is priced at $106.61. This makes the Hurricane 24 about $18.34 cheaper than the Gel-Nimbus 27, or a reduction of approximately 15%. For budget-conscious shoppers, the Saucony option may be more appealing without sacrificing quality. However, the price difference could be justified by the advanced features of the Gel-Nimbus 27, especially for those prioritizing sustainability and specific cushioning technologies.
User Feedback and Popularity
With a bestseller rank of 2393, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 demonstrates a strong following among runners, suggesting high user satisfaction. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24, with a rank of 21932, may not be as widely recognized or favored. This disparity in rankings can indicate differences in user experience, with the Gel-Nimbus 27 potentially offering a more favorable performance as reported by its users.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 largely depends on your individual needs as a runner. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and a lower price, the Hurricane 24 might be the better option for you. However, if you are looking for a shoe that combines advanced cushioning technology with eco-friendly materials, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is worth the extra investment. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths and cater to different preferences, making your personal running style the deciding factor in your purchase.

