ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on style and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and comfort, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the Gel-Pulse 17 is a budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Gel-Nimbus 28 features advanced FF BLAST PLUS cushioning.
Breathability
Engineered knit upper enhances airflow.
Durability
Synthetic rubber outsole provides better longevity.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
Gel-Pulse 17 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Gel-Pulse 17 is lighter and more versatile.
Daily Use
Gel-Pulse 17 is suitable for casual joggers.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | ASICS |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 28 | Gel-Pulse 17 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | AMPLIFOAM PLUS |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Molded Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes are priced at $169.95, making them significantly more expensive than the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, which retail for $69.95. This difference of $100 means that the Gel-Pulse 17 is about 59% cheaper than the Gel-Nimbus 28. For budget-conscious shoppers, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more accessible entry point into ASICS footwear without sacrificing too much on quality and comfort.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels with its innovative FF BLAST PLUS cushioning combined with PureGEL technology, designed to provide a cloud-like feel during runs. The Gel-Nimbus 28 is lighter than its predecessor, weighing approximately 25g less, which enhances the overall running experience. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which is softer than standard AMPLIFOAM but may not offer the same level of plush comfort as the Gel-Nimbus 28. Thus, for those seeking a superior cushioning experience, the Gel-Nimbus 28 might be the preferred choice.
Upper Material and Breathability
The upper of the Gel-Nimbus 28 is constructed from an engineered knit material that enhances breathability and reduces the need for additional overlays. This design not only promotes airflow but also wraps the foot comfortably. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17 has a mesh upper, which is breathable as well but may not provide the same level of comfort and fit customization as the knit upper of the Gel-Nimbus 28. For runners prioritizing breathability and fit, the Gel-Nimbus 28 stands out.
Shock Absorption
Both shoes incorporate advanced shock absorption technologies, yet they differ in their approaches. The Gel-Nimbus 28 utilizes PureGEL technology, which is about 65% softer than standard GEL technology, ensuring a plush landing with every step. The Gel-Pulse 17 features rearfoot GEL technology, which provides cushioning and shock absorption but may not match the enhanced softness offered by the Gel-Nimbus 28. Therefore, if shock absorption is a primary concern, the Gel-Nimbus 28 is likely the better option.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the Gel-Nimbus 28 comes in a stylish Mineral Beige and Cream colorway, which appeals to those looking for a more sophisticated running shoe. The reflective details also enhance visibility during nighttime runs. Conversely, the Gel-Pulse 17 is available in a Gravel and Lilac HINT color scheme, which offers a more vibrant look but may not be seen as versatile for casual wear. Depending on personal style preferences, either shoe could be appealing, but the Gel-Nimbus 28 may have a slight edge in terms of elegant design.
Durability and Outsole
The Gel-Nimbus 28 features a synthetic rubber outsole, which contributes to its overall durability and traction on various surfaces. The Gel-Pulse 17 also includes a molded rubber outsole, ensuring a good level of durability, but it may not provide the same long-lasting performance as the Gel-Nimbus 28, especially for long-distance runners. For those who frequently log miles, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may prove to be the more resilient option over time.
Performance for Different Running Styles
The Gel-Nimbus 28 is specifically designed for comfort over long distances, making it an excellent choice for serious runners and those training for marathons. Its advanced cushioning technologies are tailored for prolonged use. The Gel-Pulse 17, while comfortable, is more suited for daily wear and shorter runs, making it an ideal option for casual joggers or those who prioritize versatility over performance. Consequently, your running style will largely determine which shoe is more appropriate for your needs.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Gel-Pulse 17 hinges on your specific needs and budget. The Gel-Nimbus 28 is a premium running shoe that offers superior cushioning, breathability, and durability, making it ideal for serious runners willing to invest more into their footwear. Conversely, the Gel-Pulse 17 is a budget-friendly option that still provides solid comfort and performance for everyday wear and shorter runs. If you're looking for a high-performance shoe and have the budget for it, the Gel-Nimbus 28 is the clear winner. If you're after a more economical choice that still delivers on comfort, the Gel-Pulse 17 is the way to go.

