ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on popularity and design, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and price.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior comfort and cushioning, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in waterproof protection and support.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology for softer cushioning.
Design
ASICS has reflective details for visibility.
Popularity
ASICS has a better sales rank.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Weather Resistance
Brooks has GORE-TEX for waterproof protection.
Support
Brooks includes Guiderails for stability.
Price
Brooks is slightly cheaper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | PureGEL | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Air Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 22780 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes boast a modern and sleek appearance with a Mineral Beige/Cream colorway, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features a bold Black/Knockout Pink/Aqua combination. The ASICS model utilizes an engineered knit upper, which not only contributes to a lightweight feel but also enhances breathability. On the other hand, the Brooks shoe incorporates an engineered Air Mesh and 3D Fit Print, ensuring both comfort and structure. The ASICS shoe's reflective details enhance visibility during nighttime runs, adding a practical touch to its stylish design.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a key factor in running shoes, and both products excel in this area but in different ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features PureGEL technology, which offers a softer cushioning experience that is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. This makes it particularly appealing for long-distance runs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is equipped with DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, designed for a smooth and soft ride. While the ASICS shoe prioritizes a cloud-like feel, the Brooks model focuses on providing reliable support, which may appeal to runners who require more stability during their runs.
Performance Features
The performance features of both running shoes cater to different runner needs. The ASICS model includes FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which combines responsiveness with lightweight comfort, making it a great choice for those who enjoy speed and agility. Conversely, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed with a unique Guiderails Holistic Support System that aligns the body’s natural motion and reduces excess movement. This feature is especially beneficial for runners who may need additional support to maintain proper form. Each shoe offers distinct performance advantages depending on the runner's style and requirements.
Weather Resistance
Weather resistance is a significant consideration for many runners, and here the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX takes the lead. It features GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology, providing breathable waterproof protection, making it ideal for running in wet conditions. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 does not specify any waterproof features, which may limit its usability in rainy weather. For those who often find themselves running in unpredictable weather, the Brooks model offers a clear advantage.
Fit and Sizing
Fit and sizing play crucial roles in finding the right pair of running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is available in various sizes, including an 8.5 option, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is available in a size 9 medium. The ASICS model's engineered knit upper adapts to the foot shape for a snug fit, whereas the Brooks shoe employs a 3D Fit Print technology to enhance upper structure and fit. This difference may be particularly important for runners who prioritize a customized feel in their footwear.
Pricing and Value
In terms of pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is currently priced at $169.95, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is slightly cheaper at $165.00, making it about 2.3% less expensive. Both shoes are positioned in the premium price range for running footwear, but the Brooks model offers a marginal cost advantage. Despite the slight difference in price, both shoes provide considerable value for their respective features and technologies, catering to different types of runners.
Popularity and Sales Rank
When examining popularity, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 holds a sales rank of 11,265, indicating a solid presence in the market. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has a higher sales rank at 22,780, suggesting it is less popular compared to its ASICS counterpart. This difference in sales rank might reflect personal preferences among runners, as the ASICS model's reputation for comfort and performance has resonated well with customers.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ultimately depends on your specific running needs. If you prioritize comfort, cloud-like cushioning, and a stylish design, the ASICS model may be the better choice. However, if you require waterproof protection, enhanced support, and a slightly lower price point, the Brooks model is worth considering. Each shoe offers unique benefits, so assess your running style and environment to determine which model will best suit your needs.

