ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on cushioning and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers advanced cushioning and premium materials, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 7 provides excellent value for budget-conscious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning.
Weight
ASICS is 25g lighter than its predecessor.
Durability
ASICS uses premium materials for longevity.
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $85.02 cheaper.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better sales rank at 3,377.
Breathability
Brooks has an engineered air mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 28 | Anthem 7 |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Air mesh |
| Cushioning | PureGEL, FF BLAST PLUS | DNA cushioning |
| Sockliner | OrthoLite X-55 | EVA insole |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes are priced at $169.95, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $84.93, making it about 50% less expensive. This difference of $85.02 could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers. The ASICS model is positioned as a premium offering, justified by its advanced technology and materials, whereas the Brooks model serves as an accessible entry point for those new to performance running. The price disparity reflects not only the brands' market positioning but also the specific features each shoe provides.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features a Mineral Beige/Cream color palette, which is both modern and stylish, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 sports a classic White/Black/Tan combination that appeals to a wide audience. Both shoes feature an engineered upper; however, the ASICS model boasts a lightweight knit material that reduces the need for overlays, creating a sleek look. The Brooks shoe has an updated engineered air mesh upper, providing breathability and comfort. While both shoes have their unique aesthetic appeals, the choice may come down to personal preference in style.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in comfort, incorporating PureGEL technology and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, designed to create a soft, cloud-like experience for runners. This shoe is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing the overall comfort during long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is also designed for comfort, featuring lightweight DNA cushioning that decreases underfoot pressure. Its Comfort Heel Fit offers increased plushness for extended wear. Both shoes focus on comfort, but the ASICS model may provide a more premium feel due to its advanced cushioning technologies.
Performance Features
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 stands out with its combination of FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, which together provide a responsive ride and exceptional cushioning. Its OrthoLite X-55 sockliner enhances performance by offering moisture management for a cooler experience during runs. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, with its Segmented Crash Pad, focuses on smooth transitions and efficient foot landing, making it ideal for those who prioritize a streamlined running experience. While both shoes offer solid performance features, the ASICS model leans more towards long-distance comfort, while the Brooks is geared towards efficient running.
Breathability
Breathability is a critical factor in running shoes, and both models deliver in this category. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 includes a breathable knit upper that helps keep feet cool during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 features an engineered air mesh upper designed for breathability and comfort, allowing for increased airflow. While both shoes are engineered to provide ventilation, the choice may depend on which material and style resonate better with the runner's needs.
Durability
Durability is essential for running shoes, particularly for those who log many miles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is built with a durable polyester lining and synthetic rubber outsole, designed to withstand the wear and tear of long-distance running. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 features a rubber outsole as well, ensuring a solid grip and longevity. While both shoes are built to last, the ASICS model’s premium materials may offer a slight edge in durability, making it a potential choice for avid runners.
Brand Reputation
Both ASICS and Brooks have strong reputations in the athletic footwear industry, but they cater to slightly different audiences. ASICS is often seen as a brand for serious runners, emphasizing advanced technology and comfort in its shoes, as evidenced by the Gel-Nimbus series. Brooks, while also focused on performance, is known for creating accessible running shoes that are perfect for beginners and intermediate runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is currently ranked 11,265 in sales, indicating a solid following, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is doing even better at 3,377. This difference in sales rank suggests that the Brooks model may have a broader appeal among casual runners.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 comes down to individual needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, breathability, and premium materials, the ASICS model may be worth the investment at $169.95. However, if you are looking for a reliable, comfortable running shoe without breaking the bank, the Brooks Anthem 7 at $84.93 offers excellent value for money. Both shoes have their unique strengths, so consider your running style, frequency, and budget before making a decision.

