ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior technology and comfort for serious runners, while the Brooks Women's Revel 7 provides a budget-friendly, versatile option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is a premium option with advanced features.
Comfort
ASICS provides superior cushioning for long-distance runs.
Technology
ASICS incorporates advanced PureGEL technology.
Why Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Affordability
Brooks is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities.
Weight
Brooks is lighter and more adaptable.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA midsole |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Upper Material | Engineered knit | Knit upper |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | Versatile design |
| Reflectivity | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes are priced at $169.95, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe costs $74.95, making the Brooks option about 56% cheaper. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious runners or those who are exploring new shoe options without committing to a higher price point. The ASICS model's higher price reflects its advanced technology and features designed for serious runners, while the Brooks model offers a more budget-friendly choice that still delivers quality for casual use or workouts.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels with its engineered knit upper and PureGEL technology, designed to provide a lightweight and soft cushioning experience. The shoe weighs approximately 25g less than its predecessor, emphasizing its focus on comfort during extended runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 features adaptable DNA midsole cushioning that adjusts to your individual stride and weight, providing a responsive feel. While both shoes offer significant comfort, the ASICS may appeal more to those prioritizing long-distance running, whereas the Brooks offers a flexible fit suitable for various activities.
Technology and Innovation
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 incorporates several advanced technologies, including FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, which together create a cloud-like feel during runs. This shoe is geared towards runners seeking maximum cushioning and support. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 employs adaptable DNA midsole cushioning, which focuses on energy return and impact deflection. While both shoes utilize innovative technologies, the ASICS model is engineered for higher performance in distance running, whereas the Brooks shoe is more versatile for different types of workouts.
Style and Design
In terms of style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features a sleek mineral beige and cream colorway, coupled with reflective details for visibility during nighttime runs. Its engineered knit upper not only enhances breathability but also contributes to its modern aesthetic. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 comes in an oyster mushroom and primer gray color scheme, presenting a sporty and sleek look ideal for casual wear as well as workouts. Both shoes offer attractive designs, but the ASICS leans towards a more performance-oriented look, while the Brooks emphasizes versatility and everyday wearability.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a bestseller rank of 11,265, indicating a solid performance in the market, especially among dedicated runners. This rank suggests that many consumers trust and prefer this model for their running needs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 has a slightly lower sales rank of 19,777, which may reflect its appeal as a general-purpose shoe rather than a specialized running option. In this context, the ASICS model might be more appealing to serious athletes, while the Brooks caters to a broader audience.
Durability and Maintenance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is constructed with durable materials intended to withstand the rigors of long-distance running. Its synthetic rubber outsole adds to its longevity, ensuring that runners can rely on its performance over time. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 also features a versatile upper design that combines structure and breathability, making it suitable for various activities without compromising on comfort. While both shoes are built for durability, the ASICS may offer a slight edge for those focused on high-mileage training.
Performance on Different Terrains
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is ideal for road running, with its cushioning technology specifically designed to smooth out the impact of running on hard surfaces. Its lightweight construction makes it a preferred choice for long-distance runners looking for a soft landing with every step. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7's adaptable cushioning and responsive feel make it suitable for not just running, but also for gym workouts and casual outings. This versatility may appeal to those who seek a single shoe for multiple activities rather than a specialized running shoe.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you are a serious athlete seeking advanced technology and superior cushioning for long-distance runs, the ASICS model at $169.95 may be the better investment. However, if you are looking for a versatile, budget-friendly option for casual workouts and everyday wear, the Brooks at $74.95 is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running style and budget before making a decision.

