ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and weight, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on price and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is a more budget-friendly option with responsive performance.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology that is 65% softer.
Weight
ASICS is approximately 25g lighter than the previous version.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better bestseller rank of 11,265.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Price
Saucony is $50 cheaper.
Traction
Saucony has a high-abrasion rubber outsole for better grip.
Versatility
Saucony is suitable for both running and everyday wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $169.95 | $119.95 |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 34383 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | High-abrasion Rubber |
| Cushioning Tech | PureGEL | PWRRUN+ |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and Saucony Women's Triumph 22
In the world of running shoes, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and Saucony Women's Triumph 22 are two popular contenders, each offering unique benefits. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is priced at $169.95, while the Saucony Triumph 22 comes in at a more budget-friendly $119.95, making it about 29% cheaper. This comparison explores their features, design, performance, and overall value to help you decide which shoe fits your running needs.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 provides exceptional comfort with its PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. It features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning that aims to deliver a cloud-like experience during runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is built with PWRRUN+ foam, offering maximum cushioning and superior shock absorption. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS model leans slightly more towards plushness, while the Saucony is designed for a responsive ride, making it ideal for long-distance running.
Upper Design and Breathability
When it comes to the upper construction, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 features an engineered knit upper that enhances breathability and reduces the need for additional overlays. This design contributes to a lightweight feel that wraps around the foot comfortably. In contrast, the Saucony Triumph 22 utilizes a breathable engineered mesh upper, which also adapts to the foot for a secure fit. Both shoes excel in breathability, but the ASICS has the edge in terms of lightweight comfort, while Saucony focuses on a snug fit that helps minimize irritation during long wear.
Durability and Outsole Performance
The durability of a running shoe is crucial for longevity and performance. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 has a synthetic rubber outsole designed for traction and durability, making it suitable for various terrains. Meanwhile, the Saucony Triumph 22 is equipped with a high-abrasion rubber outsole that provides reliable grip on pavement and urban surfaces. Both shoes are built to last, but the Saucony's emphasis on traction makes it particularly appealing for those who run on mixed surfaces.
Fit and Sizing
In terms of fit, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed to provide a secure lace-up closure that keeps the foot in place, which is essential for stability during runs. It is offered in a range of sizes, including 8.5, which is ideal for many runners. The Saucony Triumph 22 also offers a secure fit with its adaptable mesh upper, catering to neutral runners. Both shoes aim to accommodate different foot shapes, but the ASICS model may provide a more customized feel due to its engineered knit design.
Aesthetic Appeal
Style is a significant factor for many runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 comes in a sleek Mineral Beige/Cream colorway, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22, on the other hand, presents a modern Vapor/Moon color scheme that adds a trendy touch. While both shoes are visually appealing, your personal style preference will ultimately dictate which shoe aligns better with your aesthetic sensibilities.
Pricing and Value
When considering price, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is available for $169.95, whereas the Saucony Triumph 22 is priced at $119.95. This price difference of $50 makes the Saucony approximately 29% cheaper, offering significant savings for budget-conscious consumers. In terms of value, the Triumph 22 provides excellent cushioning and performance at a lower price point, making it a compelling choice for runners who want quality without breaking the bank.
Performance for Running
Both models are engineered for running, but they cater to slightly different needs. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is ideal for long-distance runners seeking plush comfort and a soft landing with its advanced cushioning technologies. In contrast, the Saucony Triumph 22 is geared towards those who value a responsive feel and smooth transitions during their runs, thanks to its updated midsole geometry. The ASICS ranks higher in terms of sales, with a bestseller rank of 11,265 compared to Saucony's 34,383, suggesting a stronger reputation among users.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and Saucony Women's Triumph 22 ultimately depends on your running style and budget. If you prioritize plush cushioning and a slightly lighter shoe, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 might be the better option for you. However, if you're looking for a more affordable running shoe that still delivers excellent comfort and responsive performance, the Saucony Triumph 22 is a fantastic choice. Both shoes have their strengths, so consider your personal preferences and requirements before making a decision.

