ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on cushioning and support.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is a budget-friendly option with good comfort, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and support for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
lower price
ASICS is $45 cheaper than Brooks
comfortable fit
ASICS features no-sew details for comfort
lightweight
ASICS is designed for daily wear
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
advanced cushioning
Brooks uses DNA Tuned cushioning technology
better support
Brooks provides superior neutral support
higher sales rank
Brooks ranks 844 compared to ASICS at 12467
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Glycerin 22 |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 844 |
| Cushion Type | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | DNA Tuned |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Double Jacquard Knit |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 are both excellent choices for runners, but they cater to distinct preferences and needs. The Gel-Pulse 17 is currently priced at $69.95, making it about 39% cheaper than the Glycerin 22, which retails for $114.95. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a comfortable ride with its AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, designed to provide a softer experience compared to standard foams. This shoe features Rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances shock absorption, making it a great option for daily wear. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 utilizes DNA Tuned cushioning, which combines larger cells for plush landings with smaller cells for responsive toe-offs. This dual cushioning system is engineered for smooth transitions, making it ideal for various activities.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper that promotes breathability, complemented by a molded rubber outsole for durability. Its color scheme of Gravel and Lilac adds a stylish touch. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 showcases a double jacquard knit upper that not only enhances durability but also provides a flexible and accommodating fit. The color combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue offers a sleek and modern appearance. Each shoe appeals to different style preferences, with the Glycerin 22 leaning more towards a contemporary look.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is crucial when selecting running shoes, and both models offer unique benefits. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is tailored for a comfortable fit with no-sew details that enhance comfort. This shoe is available in size 9, which may limit options for those needing different sizes. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, available in size 8.5, provides a more accommodating fit thanks to its engineered upper. This flexibility may cater to runners with different foot shapes, making the Glycerin 22 a more versatile choice for a wider audience.
Performance and Support
The performance of both shoes is commendable, but they serve different running styles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for comfort during daily wear and casual runs, thanks to its shock-attenuating features. Its sales rank of 12,467 indicates a respectable popularity among runners. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, with a higher sales rank of 844, is recognized for its superior neutral support and plush cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners who prioritize performance during longer runs.
Durability and Construction
Durability is a vital consideration for running shoes, and both models present strong construction. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole that ensures longevity, making it suitable for various terrains. The use of AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning also enhances its durability by providing consistent support over time. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, with its double jacquard knit upper, not only offers breathability but also durability, making it an excellent choice for runners who push their shoes to the limit. Both shoes are built to last, but the choice may depend on the specific running conditions.
Price and Value
Value is a significant aspect when comparing running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, which is about $45 less than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 at $114.95. This substantial price difference could sway budget-conscious buyers towards ASICS, especially since the Gel-Pulse 17 still offers impressive features for comfort and performance. However, for runners seeking advanced cushioning technology and superior support, the investment in the Glycerin 22 may justify the higher price.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that still provides comfort for daily wear, the Gel-Pulse 17 is an excellent choice at $69.95. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and support for serious running, the Glycerin 22, despite its higher price of $114.95, offers superior performance. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running style and preferences before making a decision.

