ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on weight, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on fit and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers great value for casual runners, while the Brooks Glycerin 23 excels in comfort and performance for serious athletes.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is significantly cheaper at $69.95.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a sales rank of 12,467.
Weight
ASICS is lighter, making it easier for casual runs.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks Glycerin 23 features advanced ZONAL DNA TUNED cushioning.
Fit
Brooks offers a plush, engineered upper for better fit.
Performance
Brooks is designed for long-distance training and high-mileage comfort.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Current Price | $69.95 | $159.99 |
| Cushioning Tech | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | ZONAL DNA TUNED |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Triple Jacquard |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 4982 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious runners. These shoes feature a mesh upper and are equipped with Rearfoot GEL technology to ensure excellent shock absorption. With a sales rank of 12,467, they are a popular choice among runners seeking a balance of comfort and affordability. The GEL-Pulse 17 also includes AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which enhances the overall ride, making it suitable for daily wear and running sessions.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is a premium running shoe priced at $159.99. This shoe is designed for neutral runners who prioritize comfort and performance, especially during long runs or recovery days. With a sales rank of 4,982, it stands out for its advanced ZONAL DNA TUNED cushioning that adapts to the runner’s foot. The Glycerin 23 also features a plush, engineered upper for a secure fit and smooth transitions, making it a dependable choice for serious runners.
Comfort and Cushioning Comparison
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Glycerin 23 excels with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, providing softer landings and a luxurious feel. This shoe includes 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. On the other hand, the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 employs AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which offers a soft and comfortable ride but does not match the advanced technology found in the Glycerin 23. For runners who prioritize cushioning on longer runs, the Glycerin 23 may be the more suitable choice.
Design and Fit
The design and fit of both shoes cater to different runner preferences. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper for breathability, while the Brooks Glycerin 23 boasts a triple jacquard warp-knit upper that wraps the foot securely, reducing pressure points during extended wear. The Glycerin 23’s engineered upper enhances comfort and fit, which may appeal more to those looking for a snug feel. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17’s simpler design is likely to attract runners who prefer a straightforward aesthetic.
Performance in Various Conditions
Both the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 and Brooks Glycerin 23 are designed for different running experiences. The Gel-Pulse 17, with its shock-absorbing GEL technology, provides good performance for daily wear and casual runs. However, the Glycerin 23 is built for premium performance, making it ideal for long-distance training and high-mileage comfort. The Glycerin 23’s wide platform and midsole sculpting promote seamless heel-to-toe transitions, which can enhance overall running efficiency.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a critical factor for any running shoe, and both the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 and Brooks Glycerin 23 offer solid construction. The Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole that enhances its lifespan and performance on various surfaces. While specific longevity metrics are not provided, the Glycerin 23 is designed for high-mileage use with a focus on cushioning and comfort, which suggests it can withstand the demands of serious training. Runners may find that the Glycerin 23 provides better longevity given its premium materials and construction.
Price Considerations
The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is significantly more affordable at $69.95, which is about 56% cheaper than the Brooks Glycerin 23, priced at $159.99. This price difference is substantial, making the Gel-Pulse an appealing option for casual runners or those new to the sport. However, the Brooks Glycerin 23 justifies its higher price with advanced features and superior performance, particularly for those who run regularly or participate in long-distance events.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 boils down to individual needs and budget. If you are a casual runner looking for an affordable shoe with solid features, the Gel-Pulse 17 is an excellent option. However, if you prioritize comfort, advanced technology, and are willing to invest more for premium performance, the Glycerin 23 is worth considering. Each shoe offers unique benefits tailored to different running styles and preferences.

