vsversusfinder

Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on fit and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and popularity.

The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers superior cushioning and a wider fit, while the Glycerin 22 is more budget-friendly and popular among consumers.

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Price

Ghost Max 3 offers advanced features for a higher price.

Cushioning

Ghost Max 3 has nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced comfort.

Fit

Ghost Max 3 accommodates wider feet and orthotics.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Popularity

Glycerin 22 has a better bestseller rank.

Price

Glycerin 22 is more affordable.

Versatility

Glycerin 22 is suitable for various activities.

Overall score

Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
85
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
75

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 WideBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandBrooksBrooks
Current Price$159.95$114.95
Sales Rank2293844
Cushion TechDNA LOFT V3DNA Tuned
Width OptionsWideMedium

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 WideBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is priced at $159.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is about 28% cheaper at $114.95. This significant price difference could influence your decision, especially if you're budget-conscious. The Ghost Max 3 offers more advanced features, which may justify its higher price for some consumers. The Glycerin 22, however, is still a popular choice, as indicated by its bestseller rank of 844, suggesting it provides excellent value for its price point.

Comfort Features

Both shoes prioritize comfort, but they do so through different technologies. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3, designed for enhanced cushioning and comfort. This shoe is noted for its inclusive fit, making it a great option for those who may require orthotics. On the other hand, the Glycerin 22 employs DNA Tuned technology that blends dual-size cells for luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This means while both shoes provide comfort, the Ghost Max 3 may offer a slightly more plush experience, especially for long-distance runners.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 showcases a sleek sporty style with a black and rose gold color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a stylish look. The Glycerin 22, with its white, limpet shell, and amparo blue colorway, offers a more vibrant aesthetic. Both designs cater to different tastes, but the choice may come down to personal style. Ultimately, the visual appeal of both shoes is strong; it will depend on whether you prefer bold colors or a more understated look.

Fit and Sizing

The fit of a running shoe can significantly impact performance and comfort. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with more volume to accommodate a wider fit, which is particularly beneficial for those with wider feet or who use orthotics. It is available in a wide size, ensuring a comfortable fit. In contrast, the Glycerin 22 is available in a medium width, focusing on neutral support. This difference in fit may sway your decision based on your foot shape and specific needs during runs.

Performance on Different Terrains

When it comes to performance, both shoes excel in different areas. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is crafted for a plush feel, making it suitable for long runs on road surfaces. Its rubber outsole provides good traction, ensuring stability during runs. Meanwhile, the Glycerin 22 is designed for smooth transitions, making it ideal for road running and cross-training. Its broad platform and tuned heel contribute to a stable running experience. Depending on your intended use, one shoe may outperform the other based on your running habits.

Technology and Innovation

Both models integrate advanced technologies, though they focus on different aspects of performance. The Ghost Max 3 utilizes nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for a softer touch and enhanced cushioning, while the Glycerin 22 features DNA Tuned technology for a balance of cushioning and responsiveness. The Glycerin 22 is also a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and boasts the APMA Seal of Acceptance, which may be crucial for some buyers. These certifications indicate that the Glycerin 22 is not only technologically advanced but also safe for specific health needs.

Brand Reputation and Popularity

Both shoes are from Brooks, a reputable brand known for quality running shoes. The Ghost Max 3 holds a bestseller rank of 2293, while the Glycerin 22 is more popular with a rank of 844. This suggests that the Glycerin 22 is favored by more consumers, potentially due to its price point and performance features. Brand loyalty and past experiences also play a role in choosing between these two models, as many runners have specific preferences based on their experiences with Brooks.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced cushioning and a wider fit, the Ghost Max 3 may be the better option, despite its higher price of $159.95. However, if you seek a more budget-friendly choice with excellent all-around performance, the Glycerin 22 at $114.95 stands out as a strong contender. Consider your running style, foot shape, and budget, and you’ll find which shoe aligns best with your running goals.