Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and style, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on versatility and comfort.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels in comfort and versatility, making it a better choice for neutral runners, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers superior support and waterproof features.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has superior support features.
Waterproof
Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers waterproof protection.
Sales Rank
Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has a decent sales rank.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Glycerin 23 provides plush cushioning.
Versatility
Glycerin 23 is suitable for various running scenarios.
Sales Rank
Glycerin 23 has a significantly better sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT v2 | Zonal DNA Tuned |
| Waterproof | Yes | No |
| Sales Rank | 22780 | 4982 |
| Fit | Supportive | Plush |
| Use Case | Supportive runs | Daily training |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and Glycerin 23
When it comes to running shoes, Brooks offers models that cater to different needs and preferences. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed for those who require support with waterproof protection, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is tailored for neutral runners seeking plush comfort. With prices set at $165.00 and $159.99 respectively, the differences between these two running shoes are significant and warrant a closer look.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX boasts a striking black, knockout pink, and aqua color scheme, emphasizing both performance and style. Its waterproof GORE-TEX upper is not only functional but also visually appealing. Conversely, the Glycerin 23 comes in a fresh white, phantom, and cyber pink palette, providing a more minimalist yet stylish look suitable for everyday wear. While both models reflect Brooks’ commitment to aesthetics, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX’s waterproof feature sets it apart for those looking to tackle wet conditions.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Glycerin 23 is engineered for comfort, featuring zonal DNA tuned cushioning that offers enhanced softness and responsiveness, making it ideal for long runs and recovery days. It provides a luxurious feel with every step, which many runners appreciate. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, on the other hand, incorporates DNA LOFT v2 cushioning that delivers a smooth ride while also offering the support that runners who overpronate need. While both shoes prioritize cushioning, the Glycerin 23 leans more towards plush comfort, making it more suited for neutral runners.
Support and Stability
When it comes to support, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX stands out with its Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps to keep your body aligned and prevent excess movement. This is especially beneficial for runners who need additional stability during their runs. In contrast, the Glycerin 23 does not focus on corrective support, instead providing a more natural running experience. For those who require extra support to correct their form, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is a superior choice.
Weight and Performance
The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX's lightweight construction, aided by its breathable waterproof upper, allows for a dynamic performance. This is crucial for runners who want to maintain a quick pace without feeling weighed down. Although the exact weights are not provided, the emphasis on lightness in both product descriptions suggests that both shoes are geared towards performance. However, the Glycerin 23 is particularly noted for its smooth transitions, making it ideal for runners who enjoy a fluid experience throughout their runs.
Versatility and Use Cases
Both shoes are designed for specific running scenarios, but they cater to different runner types. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is perfect for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, especially in inclement weather due to its waterproof feature. Meanwhile, the Glycerin 23 excels in versatility, suitable for daily training and longer runs thanks to its plush cushioning and supportive upper. If you’re looking for a shoe that can handle various conditions and distances, the Glycerin 23 may offer more flexibility.
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, while the Glycerin 23 is slightly cheaper at $159.99, making it about 1% less expensive. This minor price difference may influence buyers who are looking for a high-quality running shoe without stretching their budget too far. However, when considering the features, the Glycerin 23 may offer more value for neutral runners, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX justifies its price with waterproof capabilities and enhanced support.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the Glycerin 23 has a significantly better sales rank at 4982, compared to the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX's rank of 22780. This suggests that the Glycerin 23 is favored by more consumers, likely due to its comfort and versatility. The higher sales rank may indicate that more runners find the Glycerin 23 aligns better with their needs, emphasizing its appeal in the competitive running shoe market.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your specific running needs. If you require a supportive shoe with waterproof protection for varied conditions, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is the better choice. However, if you prioritize comfort and smooth transitions for long runs or daily training, the Glycerin 23 is likely the superior option. Both shoes are excellent in their own right, but assessing your running style and preferences will guide you to the best decision for your feet.

