Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and weight, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe wins on cushioning and support.
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 offers a budget-friendly option with lightweight comfort, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 provides superior cushioning for longer runs.
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $84.93 compared to New Balance at $149.95.
Weight
Brooks is lighter, designed for performance.
Breathability
Brooks has an engineered air mesh upper for better airflow.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
New Balance features Fresh Foam X for superior comfort.
Support
New Balance has a structured upper for extra support.
Durability
New Balance is built for enduring longer runs.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Anthem 7 | Fresh Foam X 880 V15 |
| Price | $84.93 | $149.95 |
| Sales Rank | 3377 | 6878 |
| Upper | Air Mesh | Structured |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $84.93, making it a budget-friendly option for runners. This shoe is designed for those looking to start their performance running journey, combining comfort with breathability for an efficient running experience. The lightweight DNA midsole cushioning reduces underfoot pressure, ensuring a pleasant run. Additionally, the shoe features a segmented crash pad that promotes smooth transitions, making it ideal for both new and experienced runners. With a bestseller rank of 3377, it is clear that this shoe has gained popularity among users.
Overview of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe is considerably more expensive, retailing at $149.95. This shoe promises an unmatched level of comfort thanks to its Fresh Foam X midsole foam, which is designed to provide superior cushioning. Additionally, the structured yet breathable upper adds extra support, making it suitable for longer runs. While it has a higher price point, its bestseller rank of 6878 indicates that it also has a solid customer base, although it may not be as popular as its Brooks counterpart.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 excels with its lightweight DNA midsole cushioning, specifically engineered to decrease underfoot pressure. The shoe's updated engineered air mesh upper balances stretch and structure, providing a comfortable fit. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 V15 is marketed as having an incredibly cushioned experience due to its Fresh Foam X midsole, which contains approximately 3% bio-based content. While both shoes aim to deliver comfort, the Brooks may appeal more to those who prioritize a lighter shoe, whereas the New Balance targets runners seeking maximum cushioning.
Breathability
Breathability is a key consideration for running shoes, and both models have features that aim to enhance airflow. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 has an engineered air mesh upper that promotes breathability while delivering a snug fit. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 V15 also claims to have a structured yet breathable upper. This suggests that while both shoes offer breathability, the Brooks may provide a slight edge in terms of airflow due to its specific design focused on this aspect.
Weight and Performance
Weighing less than many running shoes, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is designed for performance. Its lightweight construction allows for an effortless run, making it suitable for both short distances and longer runs. The segmented crash pad enhances running efficiency, leading to smooth transitions. In comparison, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 V15, while providing cushioning, may be perceived as heavier due to its additional support features. Runners seeking a lightweight shoe that focuses on performance might prefer the Brooks model, whereas those looking for a more cushioned experience might lean towards New Balance.
Durability
Durability is crucial for any running shoe, and both models have features that contribute to their longevity. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 employs high-quality materials, including a synthetic mesh upper and a rubber outsole, which are designed to withstand regular use. The New Balance Fresh Foam X 880 V15 also promises durability with its structured upper and Fresh Foam midsole, which are made to endure the rigors of running. While both shoes appear to offer decent durability, the Brooks, with its established track record in performance running, may have a slight edge for those prioritizing longevity.
Pricing Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is priced at $84.93, making it about 43% cheaper than the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 880 V15, which retails for $149.95. This significant price difference may influence buyers who are on a budget or those who are just beginning their running journey. The Brooks shoe offers essential features without the hefty price tag, while the New Balance provides advanced cushioning and support for a premium price.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 880 V15 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that prioritizes lightweight comfort and breathability, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is a compelling choice. However, if you seek a more cushioned and supportive experience for longer runs, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 880 V15 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both shoes cater to different types of runners, making it essential to consider your personal preferences and running style before making a purchase.

