vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on fit and cushioning.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and durability, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 provides great value for casual use.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology

Durability

Certified PDAC A5500 and APMA Seal of Acceptance

Popularity

Higher sales rank at 844

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $69.99

Weight

Lighter design for casual use

Ventilation

Targeted ventilation in the upper

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelGlycerin 22Fresh Foam 680 V8
Price$114.95$69.99
Sales Rank84413745
Cushioning TechDNA TunedFresh Foam

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is significantly cheaper at $69.99, making it about 39% less expensive. This substantial price difference may be a major consideration for budget-conscious shoppers or those who simply want to get the best value for their money. Customers looking for quality running shoes will find that the Brooks model, despite its higher price, offers advanced features that may justify its cost, particularly for serious runners.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 stands out with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology. This feature integrates dual-size cells to provide a luxurious cushioning experience while ensuring energetic toe-offs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, on the other hand, utilizes a Fresh Foam midsole designed for an ultra-cushioned ride. While both shoes offer excellent comfort, the Brooks model may appeal more to those prioritizing advanced cushioning technology, especially for longer runs or high-impact workouts.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 provides neutral support with maximum cushioning, making it an ideal choice for various activities like road running and cross-training. The broad platform of the Glycerin 22 stabilizes the foot, ensuring smooth transitions. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is designed with a precision-engineered knit upper that offers targeted ventilation but may not provide the same level of stability as the Brooks model. Runners seeking extra support might find the Glycerin 22 more suitable for their needs.

Fit and Breathability

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a newly engineered double jacquard knit upper that combines flexibility with exceptional breathability. This accommodating fit is designed to enhance comfort during runs. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 also boasts a knit upper, designed for comfort and ventilation, but lacks the specific focus on durability present in the Brooks model. Runners may find that the Brooks shoe offers a more tailored fit, which can be crucial for long-distance running.

Durability

In terms of durability, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is built with a focus on long-lasting performance, suitable for various activities, including gym workouts. Its certified PDAC A5500 status and APMA Seal of Acceptance further reinforce its reputation for durability and quality. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, while also durable and intended for everyday use, may not match the Glycerin 22’s extensive endorsements. Those looking for shoes that will stand the test of time might lean towards the Brooks model.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 has a sales rank of 844, indicating its popularity among buyers. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 has a lower sales rank of 13,745, suggesting it is not as widely purchased. This difference in popularity may reflect the Glycerin 22’s stronger reputation within the running community, potentially influencing a shopper's decision based on others’ experiences and endorsements.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of aesthetics, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is available in a stylish colorway of White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue, appealing to those who prioritize both performance and looks. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers a more understated design that focuses on functionality rather than flashy aesthetics. For consumers who wish to make a fashion statement while running, the Brooks model may be the more attractive option.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you are looking for advanced cushioning technology, stability, and higher durability, the Brooks model, despite its higher price of $114.95, may be worth the investment. However, if you are budget-conscious and in need of a comfortable shoe for everyday activities, the New Balance model at $69.99 offers great value, particularly for casual runners. Each shoe has its merits, so consider what features matter most to you before making a purchase.