Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on fit and cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 22 offers advanced cushioning and support, while the New Balance Arishi v4 is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your priorities.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Glycerin 22 is a premium product with advanced features.
Cushioning
DNA Tuned cushioning provides superior comfort.
Popularity
Higher sales rank indicates consumer preference.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is better
Price
Arishi v4 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Arishi v4 is lighter for casual wear.
Versatility
Arishi v4 is great for casual activities.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Glycerin 22 | Fresh Foam Arishi v4 |
| Cushioning | DNA Tuned | Fresh Foam |
| Support Type | Neutral | Neutral |
| Upper Material | Knit | Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4, the most striking difference is their price. The Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Arishi v4 is significantly cheaper at $68.00, making it about 41% less expensive. This price difference may be a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. While the Glycerin 22 offers advanced features and technology, the Arishi v4 provides a more economical option without sacrificing comfort.
Cushioning Technology
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning, which blends dual-size cells to deliver both luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This technology is designed for smooth transitions and provides a plush landing experience. In contrast, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 utilizes Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, which is engineered to deliver an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride. While both shoes emphasize cushioning, the Glycerin 22 appears to offer a more specialized approach with its dual-cell structure, ideal for runners seeking advanced support during long runs.
Support and Fit
In terms of support, the Glycerin 22 provides neutral support with maximum cushioning, making it suitable for various activities such as road running and cross-training. Its broad platform and engineered double jacquard knit upper ensure a flexible and accommodating fit, contributing to stable transitions. On the other hand, the Arishi v4 also offers a secure fit through its lace-up closure and features a mesh upper with no-sew overlays. However, it lacks the specialized support features of the Glycerin 22, which may be important for runners needing more stability and cushioning during their workouts.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 comes in a stylish White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue color scheme, which is visually appealing and suitable for a variety of athletic outfits. Its engineered upper combines durability with breathability, enhancing both functionality and style. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is offered in a Pink Salt/Rosewood color combination, providing a vibrant and modern look. Both shoes cater to fashion-conscious consumers, but the Glycerin 22’s design may appeal more to those who prioritize elegance in their athletic wear.
Durability and Construction
Durability is a critical factor when considering running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a robust construction with a focus on both cushioning and stability, which is essential for long-term use. Its engineered knit upper is designed for breathability while maintaining durability. Conversely, the Arishi v4 includes a durable rubber outsole and a mesh upper that contributes to its lightweight nature. While both shoes are built to last, the Glycerin 22 may offer additional durability features that cater to serious runners looking for longevity in their footwear.
Versatility for Activities
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is highly versatile, suitable for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts. Its combination of cushioning and neutral support makes it an excellent choice for various athletic activities. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4, while also versatile, is particularly known for its lightweight feel and comfort, making it a great option for casual wear and short-distance runs. While both shoes can be used in multiple settings, the Glycerin 22 may be better suited for serious runners who engage in varied training regimens.
Sales Rank and Popularity
When examining sales rank, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 holds a notable rank of 844, indicating its popularity among consumers. In comparison, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 has a sales rank of 32,236, suggesting it may not have the same level of consumer traction. This difference in rank could reflect the Glycerin 22’s advanced features and reputation among avid runners, making it a well-regarded option in the running shoe market.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 ultimately hinges on what you value in a running shoe. If you are looking for advanced cushioning technology, superior support, and are willing to invest in a high-quality product, the Glycerin 22 is an excellent choice despite its higher price point. However, if you are budget-conscious and prefer a lightweight, versatile shoe for casual activities, the Arishi v4 offers great value at about 41% less than the Glycerin 22. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners and preferences.

