Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on breathability and cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Roav is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Glycerin 22 features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.
Support
Glycerin 22 provides better neutral support.
Durability
Glycerin 22 is built for high-performance use.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better
Price
Roav is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Roav is lighter for casual wear.
Design
Roav has a more understated aesthetic.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Glycerin 22 | Fresh Foam Roav |
| ASIN | B0D2Z2TWLX | B07RL5SM4D |
| Sales Rank | 844 | 2101 |
| Fit | Accommodating | Bootie |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe costs $79.99. This makes the Glycerin 22 about 43% more expensive than the Roav. For budget-conscious consumers, the New Balance option presents a significant cost advantage without sacrificing quality. The Glycerin 22, however, justifies its higher price with advanced features and technology that cater specifically to serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, both shoes offer unique aesthetics appealing to different tastes. The Brooks Glycerin 22 features a striking color scheme of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, making it visually appealing and versatile. In contrast, the New Balance Roav is offered in a more understated Black and Light Aluminum combination, which may appeal to those seeking a classic look. Each shoe's design reflects its brand's identity, with Brooks focusing on vibrant colors and New Balance emphasizing a sleek, practical appearance.
Comfort and Fit
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 emphasizes an accommodating fit with its double jacquard knit upper, designed for flexibility and breathability. This shoe also offers DNA Tuned cushioning technology, which provides plush landings and energetic toe-offs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav features a bootie construction that wraps the foot in a soft, sock-like feel, contributing to its comfort. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Glycerin 22 leans towards enhanced cushioning and support, making it ideal for longer runs.
Cushioning Technology
A significant differentiator between these two models is their cushioning technology. The Brooks Glycerin 22 employs DNA Tuned cushioning, which integrates dual-size cells to balance luxurious cushioning with responsive toe-offs. This technology is specifically designed for neutral support, making it an excellent option for runners who require plush comfort during their runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Roav utilizes a fresh foam midsole that absorbs impact effectively, providing a comfortable running experience. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the Glycerin 22 may be preferred by those who prioritize plushness over responsiveness.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is essential for running shoes, especially for long-distance runners. The Brooks Glycerin 22, with its well-engineered design, offers a robust construction that promises to withstand the rigors of road running and cross-training. The New Balance Roav features NDurance outsole technology, which is specifically designed for durability against road miles and daily wear. While both shoes are built to last, the Glycerin 22 may have a slight edge due to its focus on high-performance materials and construction.
Support and Stability
Support and stability are crucial for runners, and both shoes cater to these needs differently. The Brooks Glycerin 22 provides neutral support with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot, ensuring smooth heel-to-toe transitions. This makes it particularly suitable for those who prefer a natural running style. The New Balance Roav, equipped with an Ultra Heel design, offers targeted support for a secure fit. While both shoes excel in their respective categories, the Glycerin 22 may be more advantageous for runners seeking maximum support during intense training sessions.
Performance in Various Conditions
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is ideal for various running conditions, thanks to its superior cushioning and stability features. It is designed for road running and cross-training, making it versatile for different activities. The New Balance Roav is also suitable for everyday use, but its focus leans more towards casual running and daily wear. In terms of performance, the Glycerin 22 stands out for serious runners looking for a high-performance shoe that can handle multiple training environments.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, support, and are willing to invest in a high-performance shoe, the Glycerin 22 is a strong contender at $114.95. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers comfort and durability for casual running, the Roav at $79.99 is an excellent choice. Ultimately, your decision should align with your running style and how much you value specific features.

