vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on sales rank and price, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running wins on support and fit.

The Brooks Glycerin 22 offers better pricing and popularity, while the New Balance 860 V14 provides more stability for long-distance runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Price

Glycerin 22 is $114.95, cheaper than $119.88 for 860 V14.

Sales Rank

Glycerin 22 ranks 844, significantly better than 860 V14 at 13111.

Cushioning

Glycerin 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning for plush comfort.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running is better

Stability

860 V14 offers Stability Plane technology for better support.

Fit

860 V14 has an adjustable lace closure for a secure fit.

Durability

860 V14 features a durable rubber outsole.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
78

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelGlycerin 22860 V14
CushioningDNA TunedFresh Foam X
Support TypeNeutralStability
WeightLightweightLightweight

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 costs $119.88, making the Glycerin 22 about 4% cheaper. This modest price difference may be appealing for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. While both shoes fall within a similar price range, the Glycerin offers a slightly lower entry point without compromising on features or performance.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a stylish combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, delivering a fresh and vibrant look. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 comes in a more understated Black, Phantom, and Angora palette. The aesthetic appeal of each shoe caters to different tastes: the Glycerin's bright colors might attract those looking for a more sporty appearance, whereas the New Balance's darker tones may appeal to runners who prefer a classic look.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is a key feature in both running shoes, but they utilize different technologies. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 boasts DNA Tuned cushioning, which integrates dual-size cells for a luxurious feel and responsive toe-offs. This provides a plush landing that can enhance comfort during runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 uses Fresh Foam X midsole technology, designed to deliver an incredibly cushioned experience. Both shoes aim to provide excellent comfort, but the specific technologies cater to different preferences in cushioning feel.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is designed to provide neutral support, making it ideal for runners who don’t require additional corrective features. The broad platform and tuned heel enhance stability, allowing for smooth transitions during running. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 combines Stability Plane technology with its cushioning, making it a suitable option for those who need more support. This distinction may influence the choice for runners, particularly those who may overpronate or have specific support needs.

Fit and Comfort

Fit plays a critical role in choosing the right running shoe. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a double jacquard knit upper that offers flexibility and breathability, ensuring a comfortable fit. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 sports a lightweight synthetic material and an adjustable lace closure, which helps create a secure fit. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Glycerin may be more accommodating for various foot shapes due to its engineered upper.

Performance and Usage

Both shoes are designed for road running, but they cater to slightly different running styles. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 excels in providing smooth transitions, which can benefit runners looking for a seamless running experience, making it versatile for cross-training and gym workouts. Conversely, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 860 V14 is built for reliability over long distances, making it a solid option for those who log higher mileage. The performance aspects of each shoe may sway runners based on their individual running habits and preferences.

Sales Rankings

In terms of sales rankings, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 holds a rank of 844, indicating its popularity among consumers. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14, however, has a higher sales rank of 13,111, suggesting that it may not be as widely purchased or recognized as the Glycerin. This difference could reflect both brand loyalty and the shoe's performance reputation, which may influence a buyer’s decision.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 will largely depend on individual preferences and needs. If you prioritize a lower price and a shoe designed for neutral support with a plush feel, the Brooks Glycerin 22 is the better choice. However, if you need more stability and value a shoe built for long-distance comfort, the New Balance 860 V14 could be more suitable. Both shoes offer unique benefits, but the Glycerin has the edge in pricing and sales popularity.