vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning and support, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on price and breathability.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology

Support

Provides maximum cushioning and stability

Fit

Accommodating fit for various foot shapes

Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better

Price

More affordable at $60.00

Breathability

Mesh upper enhances breathability

Weight

Lighter design for casual use

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
BrandBrooksNike
Current Price$114.95$60.00
Sales Rank8441608
Upper MaterialDouble Jacquard KnitMesh
Midsole TechnologyDNA TunedFoam

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and Nike Women's Revolution 8

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 retails for $60.00, making the Nike option about 47% cheaper. Both shoes are designed for road running, but they cater to different preferences and running styles. The Brooks shoe emphasizes luxurious cushioning and support, while the Nike shoe focuses on breathability and comfort.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a white, limpet shell, and amparo blue color scheme that combines style with functionality. Its engineered double jacquard knit upper not only enhances durability but also provides exceptional breathability. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 adopts a sleek black and white design with iron grey accents. Its mesh upper is designed for increased breathability compared to its predecessor, the Revolution 7, making it visually appealing while still functional.

Cushioning Technologies

Brooks' Glycerin 22 utilizes DNA Tuned cushioning technology, which integrates dual-size cells for balanced cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This midsole technology is crafted for smooth transitions and plush landings, which is particularly beneficial for long-distance runners. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 features a foam midsole designed for comfort-focused rocker geometry, providing intuitive cushioning. While both shoes offer cushioning, the Brooks model emphasizes a more luxurious experience, making it ideal for those who prioritize comfort on longer runs.

Support and Stability

When it comes to support, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is designed to provide neutral support with maximum cushioning, making it suitable for various activities, including road running and cross-training. The broad platform stabilizes the foot, enhancing comfort during transitions. The Nike Women's Revolution 8, while also supportive, focuses more on a comfortable fit through its intuitive design. It has flex grooves in the outsole that allow for a natural foot movement, although it may not offer the same level of stability found in the Brooks model.

Fit and Comfort

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 boasts an accommodating fit due to its double jacquard knit upper, which adjusts well to different foot shapes without sacrificing comfort. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require a bit more space. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 is designed with a comfortable, breathable mesh upper that offers a snug fit but may not provide the same level of accommodation as the Brooks shoe. This difference in fit can be crucial for runners with specific preferences or foot shapes.

Performance on Different Terrains

While both shoes are intended for road running, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 excels on longer distances due to its advanced cushioning technology, making it suitable for varied terrains. The broad platform and smooth heel-to-toe transitions enhance its performance on longer runs. Conversely, the Nike Women's Revolution 8, with its comfortable outsole and flex grooves, is more suited for casual runs and everyday wear. It's ideal for beginner runners or those seeking a reliable, everyday shoe.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 at $114.95 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 at $60.00 is significant, with the Nike model being about 47% more affordable. This price point may make the Nike option more attractive for budget-conscious consumers or those new to running who want a reliable shoe without the higher investment. The Brooks shoe, while more expensive, offers advanced features that may justify the cost for serious runners seeking high performance and comfort.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, your choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, support, and a shoe designed for long-distance running, the Brooks model is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a more affordable shoe that still delivers comfort and breathability for casual runs, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running style and preferences when making a decision.