Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on durability and support, Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 wins on price and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers a balanced combination of cushioning and support, while the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 excels in maximum cushioning. Choose based on your specific running needs.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Glycerin 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning for a responsive feel.
Fit
Glycerin 22 has an accommodating fit for various foot shapes.
Durability
Glycerin 22's engineered upper enhances durability.
Why Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 is better
Price
Hurricane 24 is approximately 7% cheaper.
Maximum Cushioning
Hurricane 24 focuses on maximum cushioning for comfort.
Weight
Hurricane 24 may be lighter for some runners.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - | Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Current Price | $114.95 | $106.61 |
| Sales Rank | 844 | 21932 |
| Cushioning Tech | DNA Tuned | PWRRUN PB |
| Upper Material | Double Jacquard Knit | Unknown |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 comes in at $106.61, making it about 7% cheaper. Both shoes are designed for running, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Glycerin 22 emphasizes cushioning and support for neutral runners, while the Hurricane 24 focuses on maximum cushioning and overall comfort.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a sleek design in White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, appealing to those who prefer a stylish running shoe. Its double jacquard knit upper not only enhances aesthetics but also ensures durability and breathability. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is presented in a fresh White and Foam colorway, emphasizing a more modern look. The design of both shoes caters to contemporary tastes, but the Glycerin 22 may resonate more with those who appreciate a refined color palette.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 utilizes innovative DNA Tuned cushioning technology, which offers a plush feel upon landing and a responsive toe-off. This shoe provides a balance of soft cushioning and energetic support, making it ideal for various activities. Comparatively, the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 boasts maximum cushioning, featuring PWRRUN PB and ORTHOLITE technologies that contribute to its comfort. Thus, while both shoes excel in cushioning, the Glycerin 22 may cater better to those seeking a balanced and responsive experience, whereas the Hurricane 24 targets runners who prioritize plush, protective cushioning.
Performance and Support
The performance characteristics of both shoes differentiate their target audiences. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is designed for runners seeking neutral support, making it suitable for road running and cross-training. Its broad platform enhances stability during transitions, which is crucial for performance. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 focuses on providing profound protection through its cushioning technologies, which may appeal to those who require extra support during longer runs. Therefore, while both shoes are engineered for performance, the Glycerin 22 is better suited for neutral runners, while the Hurricane 24 excels in maximum cushioning and support.
Fit and Sizing
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers an accommodating fit thanks to its engineered upper, which adapts well to the foot's shape, providing a comfortable experience. This shoe is available in a medium width, which should cater well to most foot types. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is also designed for a comfortable fit, but specifics on its fit and sizing are less detailed. With the Glycerin 22's focus on an accommodating design, it may be the preferable option for those concerned about fit and comfort during extended wear.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a key consideration for any running shoe. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is crafted with a focus on durability, featuring a double jacquard knit upper that enhances both strength and breathability. This technology not only contributes to the shoe's longevity but also allows for a comfortable fit over time. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is described as "insanely comfortable" and "profoundly protective," yet there are no specific details regarding its materials or durability features. Based on the provided information, the Glycerin 22 may offer a slight edge in terms of durability due to its engineered upper.
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is available for $106.61. This represents a price difference of approximately $8.34, with the Hurricane 24 being about 7% cheaper. While price is an important factor, it should be considered alongside the features and performance each shoe offers. If budget is a significant concern, the Hurricane 24 provides a compelling option without sacrificing essential comfort and support.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize a balanced combination of cushioning and support for neutral running, the Glycerin 22 may be the better choice, especially given its accommodating fit and durability features. However, if maximum cushioning and comfort are your primary concerns, the Hurricane 24, at a slightly lower price, could be the right shoe for you. Consider your running style and preferences carefully to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

