vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning and support, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on price and weight.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 is a budget-friendly option with decent performance.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Glycerin 22 features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.

Support

Glycerin 22 provides better stability for longer runs.

Build Quality

Glycerin 22 uses premium materials for enhanced durability.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better

Price

Charged Assert 10 is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Charged Assert 10 is lighter at 8.9 oz.

Versatility

Charged Assert 10 offers good flexibility for various activities.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
BrandBrooksUnder Armour
Current Price$114.95$54.95
Sales Rank8445952
WeightNot specified8.9 oz
Support TypeNeutralNeutral

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Overview of Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 is significantly more budget-friendly at $54.95, making it about 52% cheaper. Both shoes cater to neutral runners, but they offer different features and technologies that may appeal to different preferences and needs.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 boasts a stylish colorway of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, making it an attractive option for those who value aesthetics in their running gear. Its double jacquard knit upper not only looks good but also provides a flexible and accommodating fit. In contrast, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 comes in a sleek Black/Black/White color scheme, which may appeal to those seeking a more classic look. While both shoes are designed with functionality in mind, the Glycerin 22 leans towards a more modern appearance, whereas the Charged Assert 10 offers a timeless, understated style.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is designed for smooth transitions and luxurious cushioning, thanks to its DNA Tuned midsole technology that ensures plush landings and energetic toe-offs. This shoe’s accommodating fit is ideal for various foot shapes, enhancing the overall running experience. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 features an EVA sockliner that provides soft, step-in comfort, along with a breathable mesh upper for ventilation. While both shoes offer comfort, the Glycerin 22 is focused on providing maximum cushioning and support, which may be preferable for longer runs.

Performance and Support

Performance-wise, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is tailored for neutral support, making it suitable for road running, cross-training, and gym activities. Its broad platform stabilizes the foot, promoting smooth heel-to-toe transitions. In contrast, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 is also designed for neutral runners, emphasizing flexibility and versatility. Its Charged Cushioning midsole utilizes compression-molded foam for responsiveness, which can enhance performance on shorter runs. While both shoes cater to neutral runners, the Glycerin 22 may provide a slight edge in terms of stability and cushioning for those who prioritize comfort during longer distances.

Durability and Build Quality

In terms of durability, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a well-engineered upper that combines durability with exceptional breathability. This is essential for maintaining the shoe's integrity over time. The Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 also emphasizes durability with its solid rubber outsole, designed to cover high-impact zones while keeping the shoe lightweight. Although both shoes are built to last, the Glycerin 22 may offer enhanced longevity due to its focus on premium materials and construction quality.

Weight and Feel

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 does not specify its weight, but its plush cushioning may make it feel slightly heavier than the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10, which weighs 8.9 oz. A lighter shoe like the Charged Assert 10 can be advantageous for runners looking to minimize fatigue during training or races. While weight is a crucial factor for some, those prioritizing cushioning may find the Glycerin 22's weight a worthwhile trade-off for the added comfort.

Price and Value

The price difference between the two shoes is significant, with the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 retailing for $114.95 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 at $54.95. This makes the Charged Assert 10 about 52% cheaper, providing excellent value for budget-conscious runners. However, the higher price of the Glycerin 22 reflects its advanced cushioning technology and overall premium feel, which may justify the cost for serious runners seeking the best in comfort and support.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and comfort for longer runs, the Glycerin 22 is an excellent investment, albeit at a higher price. Conversely, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that still offers good performance and versatility, the Charged Assert 10 is a solid choice. Consider your running habits and budget to make the best decision for your footwear needs.