vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning and support, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US wins on price and weight.

The Brooks Glycerin 22 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Charged Assert 9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology

Support

Broad platform for enhanced stability

Design

Stylish color options for a modern look

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US is better

Price

Significantly lower price point

Weight

Lightweight design for casual use

Comfort

Plush step-in feel with no break-in needed

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
Current Price$114.95$57.95
Sales Rank8442002
Midsole TechDNA TunedCharged Cushioning
Upper MaterialDouble Jacquard KnitEngineered Mesh
Fit TypeAccommodatingPlush

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Overview of Running Shoes

When comparing the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 9, it’s clear that both shoes cater to different running and training preferences. The Glycerin 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Charged Assert 9 is significantly more economical at $57.95, making it about 50% cheaper. This stark price difference points to distinct features and target audiences for each shoe, with the Glycerin 22 aimed at runners seeking advanced cushioning and support, and the Charged Assert 9 appealing to casual runners and those new to fitness.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Glycerin 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology, providing a luxurious feel during runs. This shoe features an accommodating fit with a double jacquard knit upper that allows for exceptional breathability and flexibility. The Charged Assert 9, while also comfortable, offers a plush step-in feel thanks to its foam padding around the ankle and a molded liner, creating a soft fit right out of the box. Both shoes cater to comfort but utilize different technologies to achieve it, with the Glycerin 22 focusing on high-end cushioning and the Charged Assert 9 emphasizing a straightforward, plush experience.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 sports a sleek design in White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue, offering a stylish and modern look that can seamlessly transition from running to casual wear. In contrast, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 9 comes in a classic Black/White combination, appealing to those who prefer a more understated style. While aesthetics are subjective, Brooks’ vibrant color scheme may attract those looking to make a statement during their workouts, whereas Under Armour’s simpler design may appeal to minimalist preferences.

Performance on the Road

When it comes to performance, the Brooks Glycerin 22 stands out with its engineered midsole that combines dual-size cells for optimal cushioning and energetic toe-offs. It’s designed for smooth transitions, making it ideal for road running and cross-training. The Charged Assert 9, with its Charged Cushioning midsole, delivers balanced impact protection, which is suitable for newer runners or those engaging in light training. While the Glycerin 22 is more specialized in terms of running performance, the Charged Assert 9 provides sufficient support for casual workouts and daily wear.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability is another critical factor in running shoes, and both models handle this aspect well. The Brooks Glycerin 22 features a double jacquard knit upper that enhances airflow, making it suitable for warm-weather runs. On the other hand, the Under Armour Charged Assert 9 utilizes a lightweight mesh upper designed to keep feet cooler during workouts. Although both shoes prioritize breathability, the Glycerin 22 may offer a slight edge due to its more advanced upper construction.

Stability and Support

For stability, the Brooks Glycerin 22 is engineered with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot during runs, complemented by its tuned heel and forefoot for smooth transitions. This shoe is particularly beneficial for runners requiring a high level of support. The Charged Assert 9 provides midfoot support through reinforced overlays that help keep the foot centered, which is essential for light training and walking. While both shoes provide stability, the Glycerin 22 is better suited for serious runners needing enhanced support.

Price and Value

The price difference between the two shoes is significant, with the Brooks Glycerin 22 retailing at $114.95 and the Under Armour Charged Assert 9 at $57.95. This nearly $57 price gap highlights the premium features of the Glycerin 22, which may justify its higher cost for dedicated runners. However, for those new to running or seeking a budget-friendly option, the Charged Assert 9 offers exceptional value without compromising on comfort or basic support.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 9 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you’re a serious runner looking for advanced cushioning, support, and performance features, the Glycerin 22 is worth the investment at $114.95, boasting a bestseller rank of 844. However, if you’re a casual runner or just starting out, the Charged Assert 9 provides excellent comfort and support for everyday use at just $57.95, making it a smart choice for those who prioritize value.