Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and durability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on price and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is a premium choice for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers great value for casual use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Glycerin 23 has superior cushioning for long runs.
Durability
Glycerin 23 is built for high mileage.
Performance
Glycerin 23 offers smooth transitions for serious runners.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better
Price
Fresh Foam 520 V9 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Fresh Foam 520 V9 is lightweight for casual running.
Versatility
Fresh Foam 520 V9 is suitable for everyday wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA TUNED | Fresh Foam |
| Weight | Not specified | 200 grams |
| Outsole | Durable rubber | Durable rubber |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Breathable mesh |
| Target Use | Long runs | Casual running |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is a premium running shoe priced at $159.99, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers a more budget-friendly option at $59.99. This significant price difference of $100 highlights their distinct target audiences and intended uses. The Glycerin 23 is designed for neutral runners seeking high comfort for long runs, while the Fresh Foam 520 V9 focuses on lightweight, casual running.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, providing plush cushioning that adapts to your foot's needs. This shoe is perfect for long-distance runners who prioritize comfort. In contrast, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 features fresh foam cushioning, offering responsive comfort but designed for lighter, more casual use. While both shoes provide adequate cushioning, the Glycerin 23 is aimed at serious runners, whereas the Fresh Foam 520 V9 is better for those engaging in shorter runs or daily errands.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 comes in an eye-catching White/Phantom/Cyber Pink colorway, making it visually appealing for those who want a stylish look while running. Its engineered upper is designed for a snug fit with breathable materials that minimize hotspots. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 is presented in a Black/Castlerock/Metallic Rose color scheme, offering a more understated appearance. While both shoes are stylish, the Brooks model leans more toward performance-oriented design, while the New Balance shoe emphasizes casual wearability.
Weight and Performance
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 provides a stable platform with a focus on smooth transitions, making it ideal for longer runs. Although the specific weight isn’t provided, the emphasis on plush cushioning suggests it may be heavier than the New Balance model. The Fresh Foam 520 V9 is designed to be lightweight, weighing just over 200 grams, which aids in speed and agility during runs. This makes it suitable for runners looking for a shoe that won't slow them down, especially during quick workouts or casual runs.
Fit and Sizing
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is available in a medium fit, specifically designed to accommodate neutral runners. Its triple jacquard warp-knit upper is engineered to enhance fit and comfort, reducing pressure points during extended wear. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a simple lace-up closure, allowing for easy adjustments to achieve a secure fit. While both shoes offer comfort, the Brooks shoe’s advanced upper construction may provide a more tailored fit, making it preferable for serious runners.
Durability and Traction
Durability is a key factor for runners, and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is built to handle high mileage with a resilient midsole. The shoe’s design promotes seamless heel-to-toe transitions, enhancing its lifespan over extended use. Conversely, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a durable rubber outsole that provides reliable traction on various surfaces, making it versatile for different running environments. While both shoes are durable, the Brooks model may have an edge for those who frequently engage in long-distance running.
Price and Value
With a price tag of $159.99, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is positioned as a premium product aimed at serious runners. In comparison, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 is priced at $59.99, making it about 63% cheaper. This substantial price difference reflects their target markets; the Brooks shoe aims to provide advanced features for dedicated runners, while New Balance offers a practical solution for casual runners and everyday activities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 520 V9 depends on your running needs and budget. If you are a dedicated runner seeking plush comfort and advanced features for long distances, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is worth the investment. However, if you are looking for a lightweight and cost-effective option for casual running or daily wear, the New Balance Fresh Foam 520 V9 is an excellent choice that provides good value for its price. Ultimately, your choice should align with your running style and intended use.

