Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on stability and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on price and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers superior cushioning and performance, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 provides excellent value for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Glycerin 23 features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning.
Fit
Glycerin 23 has a triple jacquard upper for a snug fit.
Performance
Glycerin 23 excels in stability and smooth transitions.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Fresh Foam 680 v9 is lighter and more suitable for casual runs.
Breathability
Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a breathable engineered mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Glycerin 23 | Fresh Foam 680 v9 |
| Price | $159.99 | $72.24 |
| Sales Rank | 4982 | 13435 |
| Cushioning Type | DNA TUNED | Fresh Foam |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9
When comparing the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, the most significant difference lies in their price and intended use. The Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, while the Fresh Foam 680 v9 is considerably cheaper at $72.24, making it about 55% less expensive. Both shoes cater to runners but target different needs and preferences.
Design and Comfort Features
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 emphasizes plush comfort and a distraction-free fit, making it suitable for long runs and daily training. Its engineered upper provides a snug fit, reducing pressure points during extended wear. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on lightweight comfort with a breathable engineered mesh upper. While both shoes offer comfort, the Glycerin 23 is designed for a more premium experience, reflected in its higher price.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is where these two shoes significantly differ. The Glycerin 23 features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole cushioning, providing a luxurious feel with 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot for enhanced responsiveness. In contrast, the Fresh Foam 680 v9 employs a precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole, delivering an ultra-cushioned ride but without the advanced technology found in the Glycerin. Runners seeking maximum cushioning may prefer the Glycerin 23, while those looking for a lightweight option might find the Fresh Foam 680 v9 sufficient.
Performance on Different Terrains
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is tailored for neutral runners and excels in various running conditions, providing smooth transitions and stability over long distances. Its wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting promote balanced movement. Conversely, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, while still supportive, is primarily designed for casual runners or those newer to the sport. Its integrated rubber outsole offers decent comfort but may not match the Glycerin's performance on challenging terrains.
Fit and Sizing Options
In terms of fit, the Glycerin 23 features a triple jacquard warp-knit upper that conforms to the foot, ensuring a secure fit without sacrificing comfort. The Fresh Foam 680 v9, with its lace closure, offers a more straightforward fit but lacks the advanced structure of the Glycerin. Runners who prioritize a snug, tailored fit may lean towards the Glycerin 23, while those who prefer a simpler, more casual fit might find the Fresh Foam 680 v9 adequate.
Price Comparison and Value
The price difference between these two models is quite stark. The Glycerin 23 retails for $159.99, while the Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for just $72.24. This makes the Fresh Foam 680 v9 about 55% cheaper, appealing to budget-conscious consumers. However, the Glycerin’s higher price reflects its advanced features and targeted performance for serious runners, potentially justifying its cost for dedicated athletes.
Target Audience
Each shoe caters to a distinct audience. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is perfect for serious runners seeking a high-performance shoe that excels in comfort and stability during long-distance runs. Its sales rank of 4982 indicates a strong following among this demographic. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, ranked at 13435, is better suited for beginner runners or those looking for an everyday trainer without breaking the bank.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 depends on your running needs and budget. If you are a dedicated runner looking for superior cushioning and performance, the Glycerin 23 is a worthy investment at $159.99. However, if you are a casual runner or just starting, the Fresh Foam 680 v9's price of $72.24 offers excellent value while still providing comfort and support for your runs. Consider your running habits and preferences to choose the shoe that best fits your lifestyle.

