Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on comfort and cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Saucony Cohesion 14 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Glycerin 23 offers premium features for serious runners.
Comfort
Advanced cushioning technology provides a luxurious feel.
Durability
Designed for high mileage and extensive training.
Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8 is better
Price
Cohesion 14 is significantly cheaper.
Entry-Level
Great for beginners looking for a budget option.
Weight
Lighter option for casual runners.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA TUNED | VERSARUN |
| Upper Material | Triple Jacquard | Rubber/Synthetic |
| Sales Rank | 4982 | 10869 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Design | Premium | Basic |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe is significantly cheaper, retailing at $49.95 compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe, which is priced at $159.99. This makes the Cohesion 14 about 69% less expensive than the Glycerin 23. Given the substantial difference in price, budget-conscious runners may find the Cohesion 14 a more appealing option, especially if they are new to running or looking for an economical choice without sacrificing basic quality.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels in comfort and cushioning with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, which provides plush cushioning and responsive toe-offs. This shoe is designed for neutral runners seeking maximum comfort during long runs and daily training. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Cohesion 14 features VERSARUN cushioning, which absorbs impact and reduces pressure for comfortable strides. While both shoes offer good cushioning, the Glycerin 23 is likely to provide a more luxurious feel, particularly over extended distances, due to its advanced cushioning technology.
Fit and Design
In terms of fit and design, the Brooks Glycerin 23 features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that offers a plush, comfortable fit and reduces hot spots during long wear. It’s engineered to conform to the foot while providing necessary structure. The Saucony Cohesion 14, on the other hand, offers a comfortable and secure fit but does not specify any advanced upper material design. The Glycerin 23 likely has the edge for runners who prioritize a custom fit and comfort during extended use.
Performance on the Road
For performance, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is built for neutral runners who need a shoe that supports smooth transitions and balanced movement. Its wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting promote seamless heel-to-toe transitions, making it ideal for varied paces and distances. The Saucony Cohesion 14, while also designed for comfort, may not match the advanced performance features of the Glycerin 23. It focuses on providing a fluid feel from heel to toe, but may not deliver the same level of support for long-distance runners.
Durability and Longevity
When considering durability, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is specifically designed to handle high mileage while maintaining comfort, making it a solid choice for those who log significant running hours. The Cohesion 14 has a redesigned outsole that aims to hold up to lots of miles but does not provide specific details on the longevity of its materials. As a result, runners looking for a shoe that can withstand the rigors of extensive training might lean towards the Glycerin 23 for its reputation and advanced design.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the Brooks Glycerin 23 holds a sales rank of 4982, while the Saucony Cohesion 14 has a sales rank of 10869. This indicates that the Glycerin 23 is more favored among consumers, possibly due to its premium features and brand reputation. A higher sales rank generally suggests a more popular product, which may influence potential buyers looking for a shoe with proven performance and satisfaction.
Brand Reputation
Brooks and Saucony are both respected brands in the running shoe market, but they cater to slightly different demographics. Brooks is often associated with premium running shoes that focus on comfort and performance, while Saucony offers a range of budget-friendly options that maintain quality. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is marketed as a high-end shoe for serious runners, while the Saucony Women’s Cohesion 14 is positioned as an entry-level shoe. The choice between them may depend on the runner's experience level and commitment to the sport.
Which should you buy?
If you're looking for an economical option that still offers comfort for casual running, the Saucony Women’s Cohesion 14 is an excellent choice at $49.95. However, if you're a serious runner seeking premium comfort and advanced features for long-distance training, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 at $159.99 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your specific running needs, budget, and how much you value advanced cushioning and performance features in your running shoes.

