Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on support and style.
The Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior performance and comfort for serious runners, while the Saucony Hurricane 24 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Glycerin 23 has premium features justifying its higher price.
Cushioning
Glycerin 23 features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole.
Stability
Glycerin 23 provides better stability and transitions for serious runners.
Why Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 is better
Price
Hurricane 24 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Hurricane 24 may be lighter due to its design.
Comfort
Hurricane 24 offers ample cushioning for casual runners.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Model | Glycerin 23 | Hurricane 24 |
| Price | $159.99 | $106.61 |
| Cushioning | DNA TUNED | PWRRUN PB |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is significantly cheaper at $106.61, making it about 33% less expensive. This substantial price difference may be a deciding factor for many buyers, especially those on a budget or looking for value in their running footwear. While the Glycerin 23 offers premium features and advanced technology, the lower price tag of the Hurricane 24 could appeal to casual runners or those new to the sport.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer unique cushioning technologies aimed at enhancing the running experience. The Glycerin 23 features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole with 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot, which promises softer landings and responsive toe-offs. In contrast, the Hurricane 24 is built with maximum cushioning, utilizing PWRRUN PB and ORTHOLITE technologies, which prioritize comfort and protection. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the Glycerin 23's specific enhancements could provide a slight edge for runners seeking a plush ride over long distances.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Brooks Glycerin 23 comes in a White/Phantom/Cyber Pink color scheme, while the Saucony Hurricane 24 is offered in a White/Foam combination. The Glycerin's engineered upper is designed to provide a comfortable fit with reduced hot spots, making it suitable for extended wear. The Hurricane 24, although marketed as a maximum cushioning shoe, may not focus as heavily on the fit and comfort features as the Glycerin. The visual appeal of both shoes is subjective, but the Glycerin 23 may attract more attention with its vibrant color accents.
Performance and Stability
The Brooks Glycerin 23 is designed for neutral runners and offers a wide platform for smooth and stable transitions, making it suitable for a variety of running paces and distances. Its advanced midsole sculpting promotes balanced movement, which can be essential during long runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Hurricane 24 is also focused on comfort and support but lacks the same level of detail regarding movement dynamics. Although both shoes aim to enhance running performance, the Glycerin 23’s design is more specialized for serious runners looking for stability and fluid transitions.
Target Audience
The Brooks Glycerin 23 is aimed at neutral runners looking for premium comfort for long runs and daily training. It’s particularly suitable for those who prioritize performance and are willing to invest in a high-quality product. Conversely, the Saucony Hurricane 24 is marketed as a maximum cushioning shoe, appealing to those seeking comfort over long durations without emphasizing performance. The Glycerin 23’s more specific target audience may make it a better choice for experienced runners, while the Hurricane 24 could be ideal for casual or novice runners.
Technology and Innovation
Both shoes incorporate innovative technologies to improve the running experience, but they do so in different ways. The Glycerin 23 boasts a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe designation and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, showcasing its commitment to health and performance. The Hurricane 24, on the other hand, highlights its use of advanced materials for cushioning without delving into specific health-related endorsements. While both shoes feature modern technology, the added certifications of the Glycerin 23 may lend it a higher degree of credibility, especially for runners with specific health needs.
Weight and Agility
While specific weight details aren't provided for either model, the focus on cushioning in both shoes suggests that they may be heavier than minimalist running shoes. However, the Glycerin 23’s engineered upper aims to offer a lightweight feel with a plush fit. The Hurricane 24, designed for maximum cushioning, might also lean towards a heavier feel but prioritizes comfort and protection. Runners who prefer a more agile shoe may find the Glycerin 23 to be the better option, as it is tailored for performance-driven runs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 ultimately depends on your running style and needs. If you seek a high-performance shoe designed for serious runners with a focus on comfort, stability, and advanced technology, the Glycerin 23 may be worth the investment at $159.99. However, if you prefer a budget-friendly option that still offers ample cushioning and comfort for casual running, the Hurricane 24 at $106.61 is a solid choice. Each shoe has its strengths, making the decision a matter of personal preference and intended use.

