Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on sales rank and cushioning, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on durability and weight.
The Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior cushioning and a structured fit, while the Saucony Triumph 22 is a more budget-friendly option with solid performance.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Glycerin 23 features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole.
Fit
Glycerin 23 has a plush, engineered upper for a snug fit.
Sales Rank
Glycerin 23 has a better sales rank at 4,982.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Price
Triumph 22 is approximately 25% cheaper.
Weight
Triumph 22 has a lightweight engineered mesh upper.
Durability
Triumph 22 features a high-abrasion rubber outsole.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Model | Glycerin 23 | Triumph 22 |
| Price | $159.99 | $119.95 |
| Cushioning Type | DNA TUNED | PWRRUN+ |
| Upper Material | Triple Jacquard | Engineered Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 comes in at $119.95, making it approximately 25% cheaper than the Glycerin 23. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious shoppers who are looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While the Glycerin 23 offers premium features and cushioning, the Triumph 22 provides a more economical option that still delivers solid performance for neutral runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, both shoes are designed for neutral runners, but they approach cushioning differently. The Brooks Glycerin 23 features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole with 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot, providing a plush feel and responsive toe-offs. This shoe is ideal for long runs and daily training, thanks to its smooth transitions and overall comfort. On the other hand, the Saucony Triumph 22 utilizes premium PWRRUN+ foam, which offers excellent energy return and superior shock absorption. While both focus on delivering comfort, the Glycerin 23 emphasizes a luxurious ride, whereas the Triumph 22 focuses on balanced performance.
Fit and Upper Design
The fit and design of the upper part of each shoe differ significantly. The Brooks Glycerin 23 features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that is breathable and conforms to the foot for a snug fit, reducing pressure points and hot spots during extended wear. In contrast, the Saucony Triumph 22 boasts a lightweight engineered mesh upper, which also enhances airflow and provides a comfortable fit. While both shoes aim to minimize discomfort during runs, the Brooks Glycerin 23 may offer a more structured feel, while the Saucony Triumph 22 prioritizes breathability.
Performance and Stability
Performance is crucial for any running shoe, and both the Glycerin 23 and Triumph 22 excel in this area, albeit with different focuses. The Glycerin 23 is designed for smooth and stable transitions, thanks to its wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting, which promotes balanced movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who prioritize seamless heel-to-toe transitions. Meanwhile, the Triumph 22 also provides a smooth heel-to-toe ride with updated midsole geometry. However, it leans more towards everyday use, making it a versatile choice for both running and casual wear.
Durability and Outsole Design
When it comes to durability, both shoes feature components that enhance their longevity. The Brooks Glycerin 23 is built to handle high-mileage comfort, making it suitable for daily training without sacrificing durability or stability. In comparison, the Saucony Triumph 22 has a high-abrasion rubber outsole that is designed to provide long-lasting durability and reliable grip on various surfaces. While both shoes are made for enduring performance, the rubber outsole of the Triumph 22 gives it an edge for those who want reliable traction during their runs.
Style and Aesthetics
Style is often a key consideration for consumers, and both the Brooks Glycerin 23 and the Saucony Triumph 22 offer modern aesthetics that appeal to different tastes. The Glycerin 23 comes in a striking white, phantom, and cyber pink color scheme, which may attract those looking for a bold and eye-catching design. Conversely, the Triumph 22 is presented in a more understated vapor/moon colorway, offering a sleek and sophisticated look. While personal preference plays a significant role in choosing a shoe based on style, both options provide attractive designs suitable for athletic wear.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation and sales rank can influence consumer choices. The Brooks Glycerin 23 holds a sales rank of 4,982, indicating a solid position among running shoes, while the Saucony Triumph 22 has a sales rank of 34,383, suggesting it is less popular among buyers. Brooks has a long-standing reputation for producing high-quality running shoes, which may make the Glycerin 23 a more appealing choice for those who prioritize brand reliability. However, the Triumph 22’s lower sales rank does not necessarily reflect its performance, as it still offers excellent features for neutral runners.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 depends on your individual running needs and budget. If you prioritize premium cushioning, a structured fit, and are willing to invest more, the Glycerin 23 is an excellent option. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly shoe that still offers solid performance and comfort for everyday use, the Triumph 22 is about 25% cheaper and provides great value. Both shoes have their strengths, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.

