vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running

Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on price and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running wins on weight and versatility.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior cushioning and support, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is a more budget-friendly option with decent comfort. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned technology.

Support

Brooks includes GuideRails for stability.

Design

Brooks has a more engineered upper for breathability.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper.

Weight

New Balance has a lighter no-sew construction.

Versatility

New Balance is suitable for casual wear.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running
72

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running
ASINB0D38FWJ8MB09H3MZQ4P
Sales Rank2097367
Upper MaterialDouble JacquardMesh
MidsoleDNA TunedFresh Foam
ClosureLace-upLace-up

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running

Overview of the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 and New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is significantly more affordable at $55.99, making it about 51% cheaper. Both shoes cater to women runners but offer different features and technologies that may appeal to distinct preferences.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a sleek look with a color combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 presents a more muted palette of Summer Fog, Nimbus Cloud, and Light Gold Metallic. The Brooks model has an engineered double jacquard knit upper that provides flexibility and breathability, making it visually appealing and functional for road running. In contrast, the New Balance model opts for a mesh upper that allows for superior airflow, keeping feet dry during intense sessions.

Cushioning Technology

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 employs DNA Tuned technology, which blends dual-size cells for a luxurious cushion and energetic toe-off. This results in soft landings and responsive transitions, ideal for runners seeking comfort over long distances. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 features a fresh foam midsole designed for responsive comfort, making it an excellent choice for both training and casual wear. The difference in cushioning technologies means that while Brooks focuses on a plush experience, New Balance aims for a balance of comfort and versatility.

Support Features

Support is a significant factor in running shoes, and the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 shines here with its innovative GuideRails support system. This technology helps keep excess motion in check, providing stability to the runner's natural motion path. In contrast, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is designed for performance, it does not include specialized support systems like the GuideRails, making it less focused on stabilizing the foot during runs. If you require higher levels of support, the Brooks model is likely the better option.

Weight and Construction

Weighing in at a lower price point, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 features a no-sew construction that reduces weight and enhances durability. This makes the shoe light and ideal for various activities beyond running. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 prioritizes cushioning and support, which may add some weight but ultimately provides a different running experience. If lightweight construction is essential for you, the New Balance shoe may be more appealing.

Versatility and Use Cases

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is designed for road running, cross-training, and gym use, showcasing its versatility for various athletic activities. Its balanced cushioning and support make it suitable for longer distances. Meanwhile, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is engineered for both performance and everyday versatility, making it a great option for casual wear as well. While both shoes can be used in multiple settings, the Brooks model may be more beneficial for serious runners seeking specialized features.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two models is significant, with the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 retailing for $114.95 and the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 priced at $55.99. This makes the New Balance shoe about 51% cheaper than the Brooks model. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance offers excellent value without sacrificing too much on features, though it may lack in areas like specialized support and cushioning.

Popularity and Sales Rank

In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is ranked 2097, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 enjoys a higher popularity with a sales rank of 367. This suggests that the New Balance model is more favored among consumers, possibly due to its affordability and versatile design. If popularity is a factor in your purchasing decision, the New Balance shoe may be the safer bet.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 ultimately hinges on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, support, and are willing to invest more for these features, the Brooks model is the better option. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly shoe that offers comfort and versatility for both running and casual wear, the New Balance shoe is the way to go. Consider your running style and budget carefully to make the best choice.