Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on cushioning and comfort, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on breathability.
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, while the Nike Revolution 8 is a budget-friendly option with decent performance.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Support
Brooks features GuideRails support system.
Cushioning
Brooks uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.
Durability
Brooks is built for long-term use.
Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Nike is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Nike is lighter and more suitable for casual runners.
Breathability
Nike has enhanced mesh for better airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running | Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Nike |
| Model | Glycerin GTS 22 | Revolution 8 |
| Price | $114.95 | $60.00 |
| Cushioning | DNA Tuned | Foam Midsole |
| Support | GuideRails | None |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 and Nike Revolution 8
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is a premium running shoe priced at $114.95, while the Nike Women’s Revolution 8 is a budget-friendly option at $60.00, making it about 48% cheaper. Both shoes cater to different types of runners, offering unique features that may appeal to various preferences. The Brooks shoe is designed for those seeking maximum support and comfort during their runs, while the Nike shoe focuses on providing a lightweight and breathable experience.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 presents a stylish design with a color combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, appealing to those who appreciate a bit of flair in their running gear. In contrast, the Nike Revolution 8 sports a classic Black/White-Iron Grey look that is versatile and easy to match with various athletic outfits. While design is subjective, the Brooks shoe's vibrant colors may attract those seeking a standout look, whereas the Nike’s neutral palette might appeal to minimalist enthusiasts.
Comfort and Fit
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 emphasizes comfort with its DNA Tuned cushion technology, which combines various cell sizes for plush landings and responsive take-offs. Its double jacquard knit upper is engineered for a flexible yet accommodating fit, ensuring stability during runs. The Nike Revolution 8, on the other hand, offers a breathable mesh upper that enhances comfort and airflow. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 may provide a more luxurious experience due to its advanced cushioning technology.
Performance Features
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 includes the innovative GuideRails support system, designed to keep your body in its natural motion path, which can be crucial for long-distance runners. This shoe is particularly well-suited for road running and cross-training. The Nike Revolution 8 features a foam midsole with a comfort-focused rocker geometry, delivering a responsive cushioning effect. While both shoes are effective for running, the Brooks may offer a performance edge for those seeking enhanced support and stability.
Breathability and Temperature Regulation
Breathability is essential for running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a knit upper that provides excellent airflow, while the Nike Revolution 8 has a mesh upper that is reportedly more breathable than its predecessor, the Revolution 7. If keeping cool during runs is a top priority, the Nike Revolution 8 may slightly edge out due to its enhanced mesh design, but the Brooks also delivers solid ventilation.
Durability and Construction
Durability is a critical factor when investing in running shoes. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is recognized for its robust construction, suitable for various terrains, making it an excellent choice for long-term use. The Nike Revolution 8, while also designed for durability, focuses more on lightweight construction, which may not withstand as much wear and tear as the Brooks. Runners looking for a shoe that can endure extensive training may prefer the Brooks for its reliable build.
Pricing and Value
At $114.95, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is positioned as a premium running shoe, while the Nike Revolution 8's price of $60.00 represents a significant savings of about 48%. The Brooks shoe justifies its higher price with advanced technology and superior support features. In contrast, the Nike Revolution 8 offers great value for those who want a quality running shoe without breaking the bank. If budget is a significant factor, the Nike Revolution 8 presents a compelling option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 and the Nike Revolution 8 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced support, cushioning, and are willing to invest more for these features, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is an excellent choice. However, if you’re looking for a lightweight, breathable option at a more accessible price point, the Nike Revolution 8 stands out as a fantastic value. Consider your running style and preferences to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

