vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on fit and stability, Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, wins on style.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.

Support

Brooks has GuideRails for enhanced stability.

Fit

Brooks offers a more accommodating fit with breathable materials.

Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better

Price

Nike is $29.95 cheaper.

Weight

Nike is lighter for casual runs.

Style

Nike has a trendy design appealing to younger audiences.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
75

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
BrandBrooksNike
ModelGlycerin GTS 22Run Swift 3
Price$114.95$85.00
Sales Rank20971650
Cushioning TypeDNA TunedFoam
Support SystemGuideRailsHeel Overlay

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is significantly cheaper at $85.00. This represents a price difference of $29.95, making the Nike option about 26% less expensive than the Brooks shoe. For budget-conscious buyers, this difference may be a critical factor, especially if both models meet their performance needs.

Brand Reputation

Brooks and Nike are both reputable brands in the running shoe market. Brooks is often recognized for its focus on comfort and support, particularly for runners needing stability. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 has a bestseller rank of 2097, indicating a solid presence among consumers. On the other hand, Nike's Run Swift 3 holds a slightly better sales rank at 1650, suggesting it is favored among shoppers looking for a versatile running shoe that balances style with performance.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology, which provides a soft landing and energetic toe-offs. The shoe features a broad platform for stabilization, ensuring smooth transitions during runs. In comparison, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 offers foam cushioning that delivers a plush underfoot feel. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model stands out for its advanced cushioning technology, which may appeal to those seeking extra support during longer runs.

Fit and Breathability

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 boasts a newly engineered double jacquard knit upper that promises an accommodating fit and excellent breathability. This feature is particularly useful for runners who experience swelling or need a shoe that adapts to their foot shape. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, while also designed for a secure fit with Flywire cables, does not specify any particular breathability features. For runners prioritizing fit and airflow, the Brooks shoe may be the more advantageous choice.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is equipped with the innovative GuideRails support system, which helps to stabilize the foot by keeping excess motion in check. This is particularly beneficial for those who may overpronate or require additional support. Conversely, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 highlights its heel overlay for added security but lacks a specific support system comparable to the GuideRails. Runners needing enhanced stability might find the Brooks model better suited to their needs.

Versatility

Both shoes are designed for various running activities, including road running and cross-training. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is noted for its capability to handle different training environments, thanks to its durable construction and support features. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, while versatile, is more focused on providing a comfortable experience for light to moderate activities. If you are looking for a shoe that can adapt to diverse workouts, the Brooks might be the more reliable choice.

Aesthetic Appeal

In terms of style, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 comes in a striking White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue color combination, which may appeal to those who prioritize aesthetics in their running gear. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3 features a modern design in White/Black-Pearl Pink-Peony, catering to those who prefer a more trendy look. Both options are visually appealing, but personal preference will ultimately dictate which design resonates more with buyers.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 boils down to your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, stability, and support, the Brooks model, priced at $114.95, is likely the better option. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly choice that still offers comfort and versatility, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 at $85.00 is appealing. Ultimately, both shoes have their merits, so consider what aspects are most important for your running experience.