vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on cushioning and comfort.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails support for stability.

Cushioning

Brooks uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.

Durability

Brooks is built for longevity in various terrains.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better

Price

Under Armour is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Under Armour is lighter at 8.9 oz.

Versatility

Under Armour is suitable for casual wear.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningUnder Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
BrandBrooksUnder Armour
ModelGlycerin GTS 22Charged Assert 10
UpperDouble JacquardMesh
MidsoleDNA TunedCharged Cushioning
Support TypeGuideRailsNeutral

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningUnder Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22. Priced at $54.95, the Charged Assert 10 is about 52% less expensive than the Glycerin GTS 22, which costs $114.95. This substantial price difference can be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While the Brooks shoe offers advanced features and support, the Under Armour model provides essential comfort and performance at a fraction of the cost.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes offer appealing aesthetics, but they cater to different tastes. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, available in a stylish White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue colorway, presents a more upscale look, suitable for both running and casual wear. On the other hand, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 comes in a classic Black/Black/White color scheme, exuding a sleek and sporty vibe. The choice ultimately depends on personal style, with the Brooks shoe appearing more versatile for various outfits while the Under Armour model is straightforward and functional.

Comfort and Fit

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels in comfort with its DNA Tuned cushioning, which incorporates dual-size cells to provide a plush landing and energetic toe-off. This shoe is designed with an accommodating fit from its double jacquard knit upper, ensuring both durability and breathability. Conversely, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 utilizes a lightweight, breathable mesh upper and an EVA sockliner for soft, step-in comfort. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model is engineered for a more luxurious experience, making it ideal for longer runs or more intense workouts.

Support Features

Support is a key consideration for runners, and the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 stands out due to its innovative GuideRails support system. This feature helps manage excess motion, providing stability during runs. In contrast, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 is classified as a neutral shoe, designed for runners who appreciate flexibility and cushioning without the added support features. This difference may influence the choice for those needing additional stability versus those seeking a more natural running experience.

Weight Considerations

Weight can significantly impact running performance, and here, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 has an advantage. Weighing in at 8.9 oz., this shoe is designed for lightweight performance, allowing for faster runs without feeling bogged down. While the specific weight of the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is not provided, its advanced cushioning technology often adds to the overall weight. For runners prioritizing speed and agility, the lighter Under Armour model may be the preferred choice.

Durability and Construction

Both shoes are built to last, but they approach durability differently. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a broad platform and high-quality materials that contribute to its longevity, especially for road running and cross-training. The Under Armour Charged Assert 10, with its solid rubber outsole, is designed to cover high-impact zones, providing durability without the extra weight. While both are durable, the Brooks model may offer a longer lifespan due to its construction focused on supportive running over various terrains.

Performance on Different Terrains

When it comes to performance, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is engineered for road running and cross-training, making it versatile for various activities. Its GuideRails system and DNA Tuned cushioning provide excellent support and comfort for longer distances. The Under Armour Charged Assert 10, while suitable for running, is more geared toward casual wear and shorter runs. Its neutral cushioning makes it a versatile option but may not provide the same level of support for serious runners as the Brooks shoe.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 ultimately hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a high-performance shoe with exceptional support and cushioning for longer runs, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is worth the investment at $114.95. However, if you prioritize affordability and a lightweight design suitable for casual running, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 at $54.95 offers excellent value. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running habits and preferences when making your decision.