vsversusfinder

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and cushioning.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the adidas Response Pace Running is a budget-friendly option for casual use.

Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better

Price

adidas is significantly cheaper at $50.70

Weight

adidas typically has a lighter profile

Style

adidas offers a sleek design

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails support system

Cushioning

Brooks uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning

Fit

Brooks has a flexible double jacquard knit upper

Overall score

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash
65
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85

Specifications

Specadidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandadidasBrooks
ModelResponse PaceGlycerin GTS 22
CushioningCloudfoamDNA Tuned
Support SystemStandardGuideRails
Upper MaterialTextileDouble Jacquard Knit

Dimension comparison

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Introduction to Running Shoes

When it comes to running shoes, comfort, support, and performance are paramount. In this comparison, we'll look at the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22. The adidas model is priced at $50.70, making it about 56% cheaper than the Brooks model, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference sets the stage for a deeper exploration of what each shoe offers.

Comfort and Cushioning

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is designed with Cloudfoam cushioning, providing all-day comfort and support. This feature is particularly appealing for casual runners or those who value comfort during extended wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 incorporates advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology, which offers luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This shoe is designed for those who seek a plush experience during their runs, especially over longer distances. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model's technology may cater better to those looking for a superior cushioning experience.

Support Features

Support is a critical aspect of any running shoe, and here, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 shines. It features the innovative GuideRails support system, which helps stabilize the foot by managing excess motion. This system is ideal for runners who may overpronate or require additional support during their runs. In contrast, the adidas Response Pace Running offers a more standard support structure with its regular fit and Ortholite sockliner. While it provides comfort, it may not deliver the same level of stabilization as the Brooks. Therefore, if support is your primary concern, the Glycerin GTS 22 is the more suitable option.

Fit and Breathability

The fit of a running shoe can significantly impact performance and comfort. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a double jacquard knit upper, which is engineered to provide a flexible and accommodating fit. This design not only enhances comfort but also promotes exceptional breathability. Meanwhile, the adidas Response Pace Running has a textile upper, which, while comfortable, may not offer the same level of breathability or flexibility as the Brooks model. For runners prioritizing a snug yet breathable fit, the Glycerin GTS 22 is likely the better choice.

Performance and Versatility

In terms of performance, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is designed for smooth transitions and stability, making it suitable for various activities, including road running and cross-training. Its broad platform stabilizes the foot, promoting efficient movement. Conversely, the adidas Response Pace Running, while comfortable, may not provide the same versatility. It’s a great option for casual use and short runs, but if you're looking for a shoe that can handle a variety of activities with ease, the Brooks is more adaptable.

Weight and Agility

Weight is an important factor for runners who want agility and speed. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running typically has a lighter profile due to its simpler design and materials. While specific weight details are not provided, the Cloudfoam cushioning system is generally lighter than the more robust technologies found in the Brooks. However, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, with its advanced cushioning and support systems, may feel bulkier but is engineered for performance over speed. Thus, the choice between the two may depend on whether you prioritize lightweight agility or comprehensive support and cushioning.

Style and Aesthetics

Aesthetics can play a role in the choice of running shoes. The adidas Women’s Response Pace Running comes in a sleek Dash Grey/Silver Metallic/Beam Orange colorway, appealing to those who prefer a more understated look. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 showcases a bolder White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue combination, which may attract those looking for a more vibrant appearance. Both shoes offer stylish options, but your personal taste will ultimately guide your choice.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 depends on your specific needs and budget. The adidas model is significantly cheaper at $50.70, making it a great option for casual runners or those new to the sport. However, for serious runners who prioritize advanced support and cushioning, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, priced at $114.95, offers superior technology and features, making it worth the investment. If you're seeking comfort on a budget, go with the adidas; if you require comprehensive support and performance, the Brooks is the way to go.