Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on support and cushioning.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 excels in performance and support for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is $49.00 compared to Brooks at $114.95.
Design
Adidas has a minimalist aesthetic.
Weight
Adidas is lightweight for casual wear.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Support
Brooks features GuideRails support system.
Cushioning
Brooks uses DNA Tuned technology for better cushioning.
Performance
Brooks is designed for serious running.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Glycerin GTS 22 |
| Size | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Upper | Mesh | Double Knit |
| Outsole | Rubber | Broad Platform |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the prices of Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, the Adidas option is about 57% cheaper at $49.00 compared to $114.95 for the Brooks shoe. This substantial price difference may appeal to budget-conscious consumers looking for a stylish and functional sneaker without breaking the bank. While the Adidas option offers a more affordable entry into women's running-inspired footwear, the Brooks shoe’s higher price reflects its advanced technology and support features designed for serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path boasts a sleek, lightweight design, making it an attractive option for everyday wear. Its black and white color scheme provides versatility, allowing it to pair well with various outfits. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 features a more vibrant look with a combination of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, appealing to those who prefer a pop of color in their running gear. While both shoes are stylish, the Adidas option leans towards a minimalist aesthetic, while the Brooks emphasizes a more dynamic appearance.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a Cloudfoam midsole that delivers step-in comfort and superior cushioning. This is especially beneficial for those who prioritize ease during casual outings. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 uses DNA Tuned technology, which offers a luxurious cushioning experience tailored for runners needing a balance of softness and responsiveness. The Brooks shoe’s advanced cushioning system, designed for smooth transitions, sets it apart for long-distance runners looking for enhanced comfort during their workouts.
Fit and Sizing
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is designed for a lightweight, breathable fit with a textile lining that provides a soft, comfortable feel. This makes it suitable for casual wear and light exercise. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 features an accommodating fit with a double jacquard knit upper, delivering flexibility and breathability while ensuring durability. This means that while both shoes are available in size 8.5, the Brooks shoe may provide a more secure and tailored fit for those engaging in rigorous activities, making it more suitable for running.
Support Features
Support is a critical factor for runners, and here the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 shines with its innovative GuideRails support system. This feature helps stabilize the foot by controlling excess motion, making it an excellent choice for those prone to overpronation. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, while supportive in its own right, does not offer the same level of specialized support, focusing instead on light usage and comfort. For serious runners, the Brooks shoe’s support mechanisms are a significant advantage, particularly for long-distance training.
Performance and Usability
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is primarily designed for everyday wear and light running, making it a versatile sneaker for casual activities. Its rubber outsole provides decent grip, suitable for urban environments. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is built for performance with features that enhance road running experiences, such as a broad platform for stability and a tuned heel for smoother transitions. Those who plan to use their shoes for serious running sessions will find the Brooks shoe more beneficial due to its performance-oriented design.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Both brands hold strong reputations in the athletic footwear market. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path has a sales rank of 2,513, indicating moderate popularity among consumers. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ranks slightly higher at 2,097, reflecting a strong interest in its performance capabilities. This difference in sales rank suggests that while both shoes are well-regarded, the Brooks option may have a stronger following among dedicated runners, further justifying its higher price point.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your intended use and budget. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish sneaker for casual wear or light exercise, the Adidas shoe, priced at $49.00, is an attractive option. However, if you are a serious runner seeking advanced support, cushioning, and overall performance, investing in the Brooks shoe at $114.95 may be the better choice. Consider your needs carefully to make the most informed decision.

