adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark leads on cushioning and fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers superior cushioning and performance for serious runners, while the adidas Womens Swift Run is better suited for casual wear.
Why adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 is better
Price
adidas is $5 more expensive
Design
Sleek minimalist look
Comfort
Flexible upper for casual wear
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Cushioning
FF BLAST PLUS technology for better comfort
Popularity
Higher sales rank at 2,352
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Swift Run | Gel-Excite 11 |
| Upper Material | Knit | Mesh |
| Midsole | EVA | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Color | White/Gold | Dark Pink/Orange |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas Womens Swift Run and ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11
The adidas Womens Swift Run is priced at $79.95, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is available for $74.95, making it about 6% cheaper than the adidas option. Both shoes cater to women seeking comfort and style in their running shoes, but they have distinct features that may appeal to different preferences. The adidas Swift Run boasts a sleek design focused on all-day comfort, while the ASICS Gel-Excite 11 emphasizes advanced cushioning technologies for a supportive running experience.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the adidas Womens Swift Run is characterized by its sleek, minimalist look in a white and gold colorway, making it an eye-catching option for casual and athletic wear alike. The soft knit upper enhances both comfort and flexibility. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 comes in a vibrant dark pink and orange glow combination, appealing to those who enjoy bold colors. Its engineered mesh upper not only contributes to breathability but also reduces the need for additional overlays, ensuring a lightweight feel during runs.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the adidas Womens Swift Run is designed for all-day wear with a flexible upper and a lightweight EVA midsole for cushioning. However, it is noted that these shoes run big, suggesting buyers should consider purchasing a half size smaller for optimal fit. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which offers a blend of soft cushioning and responsiveness. Additionally, its PureGEL technology is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, providing an exceptionally comfortable experience for runners.
Performance on the Road
In terms of performance, the adidas Swift Run is more suited for casual wear and light running due to its focus on comfort rather than advanced running technologies. It has a sales rank of 14,676, indicating moderate popularity. The ASICS Gel-Excite 11, however, is designed with runners in mind, featuring FLUIDRIDE outsole technology that aids in creating smoother strides. With a sales rank of 2,352, it is clearly a more popular choice among serious runners, underscoring its performance-oriented design.
Cushioning Technologies
Cushioning is a standout feature of the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11. Its FF BLAST PLUS foam provides a lightweight and soft ride, while the AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning offers additional comfort, making it ideal for longer runs. In contrast, the adidas Womens Swift Run uses a lightweight EVA midsole for cushioning, which, while effective for everyday use, does not match the advanced cushioning technologies found in the ASICS model. The difference in cushioning design reflects the intended use of each shoe, with ASICS targeting serious runners and adidas focusing on lifestyle wear.
Breathability and Weight
Breathability is critical for running shoes, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 excels with its engineered mesh upper, designed to promote airflow and keep feet cool during intense workouts. The lightweight materials reduce fatigue over time, enhancing performance. The adidas Womens Swift Run, while comfortable, does not emphasize breathability to the same extent, as its soft knit upper is less technical. This difference could influence the choice for those who prioritize ventilation in their footwear.
Price Comparison
The adidas Womens Swift Run is priced at $79.95, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is available for $74.95, making the ASICS option about $5 cheaper. This price difference of approximately 6% may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers. Given that both shoes offer unique features, the price point could sway potential buyers towards the ASICS model, especially considering its performance-oriented design.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas Womens Swift Run and ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a stylish shoe for everyday use with a focus on comfort, the adidas model may be the right choice. However, if you're a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and performance features, the ASICS option, with its better sales rank and superior technologies, stands out as the better investment. Both shoes have their merits, making the decision reliant on individual priorities in comfort, performance, and style.

