vsversusfinder

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion wins on weight, Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on cushioning and support.

The ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes offer great value for budget-conscious buyers, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels in support and cushioning for serious runners.

Why ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion is better

Price

ALLSWIFIT is significantly cheaper at $63.97.

Weight

ALLSWIFIT weighs only 7.5 oz per shoe.

Versatility

ALLSWIFIT is suitable for various activities.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails for better stability.

Cushioning

Brooks uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.

Popularity

Brooks has a higher sales rank of 2,097.

Overall score

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion
75
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
88

Specifications

SpecALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes CushionBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandALLSWIFITBrooks
ModelAWUMRS2503Glycerin GTS 22
ColorWhiteWhite/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue
Energy Return67%N/A
Upper MaterialJacquardDouble Jacquard Knit

Dimension comparison

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes CushionBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Price Comparison

The ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes are priced at $63.97, making them about 44% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which costs $114.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious buyers who are looking for a quality running shoe without breaking the bank. Despite the lower price, the ALLSWIFIT shoes do not compromise on essential features, making them an attractive option for those who want to balance cost with performance.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes feature a lightweight and breathable Jacquard upper, contributing to their overall comfort and style. The shoes are available in a clean white color, which can easily match various outfits. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers a distinct color combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, appealing to those who prefer a bit more flair in their footwear. Both products maintain a modern aesthetic, but the choice largely depends on personal style preferences.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ALLSWIFIT running shoes incorporate supercritical foam technology that provides an impressive 67% energy return, enhancing comfort during long runs. This cushioning system is designed to absorb impact effectively, allowing for a more pleasant running experience. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning, which balances soft landings with energetic toe-offs. This shoe is equipped with larger cells in the heel for plush cushioning and smaller cells in the forefoot for responsiveness. Both shoes excel in comfort, but the Brooks may edge out slightly for those who prioritize advanced cushioning technology.

Stability and Support

When it comes to stability, the ALLSWIFIT shoes are designed with a wide base and an ergonomic rocker sole, offering smooth heel-to-toe transitions. The slip-resistant outsole enhances traction, making these shoes suitable for various surfaces. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is equipped with the innovative GuideRails support system, which helps stabilize your foot and manage excess movement during your run. This makes the Brooks a better option for runners who require additional support to maintain their natural motion path. Both shoes provide adequate support, but the Brooks may be more suitable for those seeking extra stability.

Weight and Flexibility

The ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes weigh approximately 7.5 oz per shoe, providing a lightweight feel that can enhance performance during runs. This lightweight design allows for greater agility and less fatigue over long distances. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, while offering a more substantial feel, is still designed with a flexible knit upper that accommodates various foot shapes while maintaining breathability. Runners who favor a lighter shoe may prefer the ALLSWIFIT, whereas those who appreciate a snugger fit might lean towards the Brooks.

Durability and Construction

Both shoes are constructed for durability, but they approach it differently. The ALLSWIFIT shoes feature a wear-resistant rubber outsole, designed to withstand the rigors of various running surfaces. This durability is important for those who plan to wear their shoes frequently for workouts or casual use. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is also built to last, with an engineered double jacquard knit upper that provides both flexibility and durability. While both options are robust, the choice may depend on the specific activities you intend to use them for, with the Brooks possibly offering an edge for dedicated runners.

Customer Feedback and Popularity

In terms of market performance, the ALLSWIFIT shoes hold a sales rank of 20,771, indicating that they are popular among buyers looking for affordable athletic footwear. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 holds a significantly higher sales rank of 2,097, showcasing its status as a favored choice among serious runners and those seeking high-quality support. This difference in popularity may reflect the Brooks' reputation for performance and reliability, while the ALLSWIFIT shoes attract those who prioritize value.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes and the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 hinges on individual preferences and priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the ALLSWIFIT option provides excellent comfort and lightweight design at a lower price point. However, if you require superior support and cushioning for serious running, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 may justify its higher price with advanced features and a strong reputation in the running community. Both shoes have their merits, so consider what aspects matter most to you before making a decision.