vsversusfinder

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and cushioning.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it a better choice for those needing stability. However, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA is a more budget-friendly option.

Why ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 is better

Price

ALTRA is $14.98 cheaper than Brooks

Weight

ALTRA is lighter due to its minimal design

Foot Health

ALTRA promotes good foot health with APMA Seal

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails for enhanced stability

Cushioning

Brooks uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning

Popularity

Brooks has a higher bestseller rank

Overall score

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5
75
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85

Specifications

SpecALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandALTRABrooks
ModelFWD VIAGlycerin GTS 22
ColorLight GrayWhite/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue
Size8.58.5
Sales Rank232942097

Dimension comparison

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Price Comparison

The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.97, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which retails for $114.95. This price difference of $14.98 could be significant for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes. While both shoes are designed for performance, the ALTRA offers a more economical choice without compromising on features.

Brand Reputation

ALTRA and Brooks are well-respected brands in the running shoe market, each with their own strengths. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 boasts a bestseller rank of 2097, indicating it is highly favored among consumers. Meanwhile, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA has a higher sales rank of 23294, suggesting it may not be as widely recognized but still serves a niche audience that values its unique features. The brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, especially for those who prioritize tried-and-true options like Brooks.

Comfort Features

The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA highlights comfort with its Altra EGO FLO supercritical midsole foam, designed to provide a lightweight and soft underfoot feel. This shoe also includes a rocker shape for efficient toe-offs. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning, which combines soft landings with energetic toe-offs. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks model integrates GuideRails support to enhance stability, making it suitable for runners who may need additional motion control during their runs.

Support and Stability

When it comes to support, the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 shines with its innovative GuideRails holistic support system, which helps to stabilize excessive body movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who may experience overpronation or need guidance in their natural motion path. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA, while promoting good foot health with the American Podiatric Medical Association's Seal of Acceptance, does not specifically highlight additional stability features. For those prioritizing support, the Brooks option may be more appealing.

Design and Aesthetics

Both shoes offer visually appealing designs, but they cater to different aesthetics. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA showcases a light gray color scheme, which presents a sleek and modern look. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 comes in a dynamic combination of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, providing a vibrant and eye-catching appearance. The choice between these designs may be subjective, depending on individual style preferences, but both shoes maintain a professional and athletic design.

Fit and Sizing

Fit is crucial for comfort and performance in running shoes. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA is designed to promote a natural stride and accommodate various foot shapes, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a newly engineered double jacquard knit upper for a flexible and accommodating fit. Both shoes cater to runners who value comfort, but those with unique foot shapes may gravitate towards the ALTRA for its natural fit. Meanwhile, the Brooks model ensures a secure fit that caters to a variety of foot sizes.

Performance on the Road

In terms of performance, both running shoes cater to road runners but offer different experiences. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA emphasizes a propelling forward feeling with its rocker shape, which can enhance the running experience for those looking for efficiency. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 focuses on providing smooth transitions with its tuned heel and forefoot, making it versatile for various activities beyond running, such as gym workouts and cross-training. Depending on your primary use, one shoe may outperform the other in specific scenarios.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 comes down to individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that offers comfort and promotes good foot health, the ALTRA may be the better choice at $99.97. However, if you prioritize advanced support features and are willing to invest more for enhanced stability and cushioning, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 at $114.95 might be worth the extra cost. Each shoe has distinct advantages, so consider your running style, foot support needs, and budget before making a decision.