vsversusfinder

ALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe, Black, 9 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and breathability, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the ALTRA Women's Torin 7 is more budget-friendly.

Why ALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe, Black, 9 is better

Price

ALTRA is $57.36 cheaper than ASICS

Flexibility

ALTRA's FootPod technology allows for natural foot movement

Durability

ALTRA features Altra EGO MAX midsole foam for added durability

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS uses FF BLAST PLUS for cloud-like softness

Breathability

ASICS has an engineered knit upper for better airflow

Weight

ASICS is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor

Overall score

ALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe, Black, 9
75
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85

Specifications

SpecALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe, Black, 9ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
BrandALTRAASICS
ModelTorin 7Gel-Nimbus 28
MidsoleAltra EGO MAXFF BLAST PLUS
UpperStandardEngineered Knit
SocklinerStandardOrthoLite X-55

Dimension comparison

ALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe, Black, 9ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Price Comparison

When comparing the ALTRA Women's Torin 7 Road Running Shoe and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, the ALTRA model is about 17% cheaper at $112.59 compared to the ASICS, which costs $169.95. This makes the ALTRA a more budget-friendly option for runners looking for quality without breaking the bank. While both shoes are designed for optimal performance, the price difference may influence some buyers towards the ALTRA option, especially if they are budget-conscious yet still seeking a reliable running shoe.

Comfort and Cushioning

The comfort levels of both shoes are noteworthy, but they achieve this through different technologies. The ALTRA Women's Torin 7 features the Altra EGO MAX midsole foam, which provides extra bounce and durability. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 boasts FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, which offers a cloud-like softness and responsiveness. These technologies make the ASICS approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing the comfort during long-distance runs. Thus, while both shoes excel in comfort, the ASICS may provide a slightly more cushioned experience that runners might appreciate for extended wear.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and here the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has an edge with its engineered knit upper that promotes airflow while minimizing the need for additional overlays. This feature is designed to keep feet cool and comfortable during runs. The ALTRA Women's Torin 7, while equipped with FootPod technology for natural movement, does not specifically mention breathability features. Therefore, if maintaining a cooler foot environment is a priority, the ASICS might be the better choice.

Support and Stability

Both shoes offer excellent support, but they cater to different preferences. The ALTRA Women's Torin 7 is recognized for its FootPod technology, which allows for natural foot movement and flexibility, making it an appealing choice for those who prefer a more natural running style. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 incorporates the OrthoLite X-55 sockliner, which provides superior cushioning performance and moisture management. This feature supports a slightly more structured fit, beneficial for runners seeking stability. Consequently, your choice may depend on whether you value flexibility or structured support more in your running experience.

Weight and Performance

Weight can significantly affect running performance; the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is about 25 grams lighter than its previous version, which translates to a more agile feel during runs. This lighter weight is complemented by its innovative cushioning technologies that enhance responsiveness. In contrast, while the ALTRA Women's Torin 7 provides a decent bounce, it does not emphasize weight reduction in its features. Therefore, for runners focused on speed and agility, the ASICS may be the superior choice due to its lighter construction and advanced cushioning.

Brand Reputation

Both ALTRA and ASICS have solid reputations in the running community, but ASICS tends to be more widely recognized due to its longer history in the market. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a bestseller rank of 11,265, indicating its popularity among consumers. The ALTRA Women's Torin 7, with a bestseller rank of 24,358, is also respected but may not be as established in the mainstream running shoe market. Brand reputation could sway buyers who prioritize proven performance backed by a larger community of users.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes offer appealing looks but cater to different tastes. The ALTRA Women's Torin 7, available in a striking black colorway, presents a sleek and modern appearance, suitable for both running and casual wear. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28, in Mineral Beige/Cream, provides a more classic and versatile aesthetic that can easily transition from the track to everyday activities. The choice here depends on personal style preferences, but both shoes offer visually appealing options for runners.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ALTRA Women's Torin 7 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 comes down to personal preference and specific running needs. If budget is a key concern, the ALTRA offers significant savings while still providing quality features like the Altra EGO MAX midsole. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning, breathability, and a lighter feel, the ASICS might justify its higher price tag with superior technology and comfort. Both shoes have their strengths, making them excellent options in the running shoe category, but your final decision should align with your individual running style and requirements.