vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers a budget-friendly option with decent cushioning, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in support and dynamic cushioning. Choose based on your specific running needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Price

ASICS is $24 cheaper than Brooks.

Wide Fit

ASICS offers a wide version for broader feet.

Lightweight

ASICS aims for a lighter ride with its cushioning.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

Support

Brooks features GUIDERAILS for enhanced support.

Cushioning

Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for plush comfort.

Sales Rank

Brooks has a better sales rank at 1,047.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
75
Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Excite 11Adrenaline GTS 24
Cushioning TechFF BLAST PLUSDNA Loft v3
Support TechNoneGUIDERAILS
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshAir Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are about 24% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive Running Shoe. The ASICS model is priced at $74.95, while the Brooks shoe costs $98.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. Both shoes are well-regarded in their respective categories, with the ASICS ranking at 2,352 and the Brooks at 1,047 in sales rank.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers advanced cushioning technology that adapts to your stride, thanks to its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam. This feature is designed to provide lightweight, plush comfort for long runs. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 also emphasizes cushioning with its FF BLAST PLUS and AMPLIFOAM PLUS technologies, which deliver a soft and responsive ride. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks shoe is particularly noted for its dynamic cushioning that enhances the running experience, potentially making it a better option for those who prioritize cushioning.

Support Features

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is distinguished by its GUIDERAILS HOLISTIC SUPPORT SYSTEM, which helps to support natural motion while minimizing excess movement. This feature can be particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during their runs. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 focuses on overall comfort rather than specific support features. While it offers good cushioning and a breathable mesh upper, it does not have the same level of structured support as the Brooks model. Therefore, runners seeking enhanced support may find the Brooks shoe a more suitable choice.

Breathability

Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and both models excel in this aspect, albeit in different ways. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper, providing a balance of breathability, stretch, and structure for a comfortable fit. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 utilizes an engineered mesh upper to reduce the need for additional overlays, promoting a lightweight and breathable design. While both shoes prioritize ventilation, the Brooks shoe may offer a slight edge due to its specifically engineered upper for breathability.

Fit and Sizing Options

When considering fit, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 comes in a wide version, which may appeal to runners with broader feet. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, however, is available in a medium width but is designed to provide an accommodating fit due to its engineered upper. For those who require a wider fit, the ASICS option may be more comfortable. However, the Brooks shoe's accommodating design may still offer sufficient comfort for most foot shapes.

Weight

Weight can significantly impact running performance, and while specific weights are not provided, the technologies used in each shoe suggest different weight profiles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which aims to provide a lighter ride than traditional foam options. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 focuses on a plush feel with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which may add a bit more weight due to its supportive design. Runners who prefer a lighter shoe may lean towards the ASICS model.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetics can play an important role in a runner's shoe choice, and both models offer stylish designs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is available in a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow colorway, appealing to those who enjoy a pop of color. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 opts for a sleek Black/Black/Ebony combination, which may attract those who prefer a more classic look. Ultimately, the choice comes down to personal taste, as both shoes present visually appealing options for runners.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes down to your specific needs as a runner. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option with a wide fit and decent cushioning, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is a strong contender at $74.95. However, if you require superior support and dynamic cushioning for longer runs, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, priced at $98.95, could be worth the investment. Both shoes have their strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.