vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on fit and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers a budget-friendly option with solid features, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 excels in advanced cushioning and stability.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Price

ASICS is $40 cheaper than Brooks

Color Options

ASICS offers a vibrant color scheme

Weight

ASICS is lighter than Brooks

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning

Stability

Brooks provides better stability for various activities

Popularity

Brooks has a higher bestseller rank

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
75
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Excite 11Glycerin 22
WeightLightModerate
FitStandardAccommodating
TechnologyFF BLAST PLUSDNA Tuned

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkBrooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, making them about 35% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers who still want quality running shoes. While the ASICS model is positioned as a more affordable option, the Brooks shoe may justify its higher price with advanced features and technology aimed at serious runners.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, both the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 present stylish options for runners. The ASICS shoe features a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow color scheme, ideal for those who like a pop of color during their runs. In contrast, the Brooks shoe offers a more subdued look with its White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue palette, appealing to runners who prefer a classic aesthetic. Both shoes are designed for comfort, but the choice between vibrant and classic will depend on personal style.

Cushioning Technology

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 utilizes FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which combines cloud-like comfort with a responsive ride. This midsole foam is engineered to be lighter than previous versions, providing a soft feel. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 boasts its innovative DNA Tuned cushioning, which integrates dual-size cells for luxurious cushioning and responsive toe-offs. This advanced technology ensures that each step is both comfortable and energizing, making the Brooks shoe an excellent choice for runners prioritizing cushioning.

Breathability and Fit

In terms of breathability, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that promotes airflow and reduces the need for additional overlays. This design not only enhances comfort but also helps keep your feet cool during intense workouts. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers a double jacquard knit upper, providing a flexible and accommodating fit that combines durability with exceptional breathability. For those who prioritize a snug and adaptable fit, the Brooks may have the edge.

Performance and Stability

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 includes the FLUIDRIDE outsole, which is designed to create smoother strides, enhancing overall performance during runs. This shoe also features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for added comfort. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 provides neutral support with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot, ensuring smooth transitions from heel to toe. The Glycerin’s design is particularly beneficial for runners seeking stability during various activities, such as cross-training or gym workouts.

Targeted Usage

The ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 is ideal for runners looking for a versatile shoe for both running and fitness routines, thanks to its comfortable and adaptable design. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, however, is marketed as a neutral support shoe suited for road running, cross-training, and the gym. Its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and the APMA Seal of Acceptance highlight its suitability for a wider range of activities, making it a more specialized choice for serious runners.

Sales and Popularity

With a bestseller rank of 2352, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 shows a solid presence in the market, indicating a good level of consumer satisfaction. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 ranks even higher at 844, suggesting that it is a more popular choice among consumers. This sales data may reflect the Glycerin's reputation for quality and performance, which could influence potential buyers looking for a trusted option for their running needs.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you seek a more affordable shoe with solid cushioning and a vibrant design, the ASICS model is a compelling option at $74.95. However, if you're willing to invest in advanced cushioning technology and a shoe that provides excellent stability and support, the Brooks Glycerin 22 at $114.95 may be worth the extra cost. The decision should align with your priorities in terms of performance, comfort, and style.