ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on price and sales rank, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers better value and advanced cushioning, while the Brooks Women's Trace 4 excels in comfort and brand reputation.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Price
ASICS is $16.80 cheaper than Brooks.
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced FF BLAST PLUS cushioning.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank of 2352.
Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Brooks offers DNA LOFT v2 cushioning for a softer ride.
Breathability
Brooks has an engineered air mesh upper.
Smooth Transitions
Brooks includes a segmented crash pad for better transitions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark | Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Current Price | $74.95 | $91.75 |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Air Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 2352 | 12197 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $91.75. This price difference can be significant for budget-conscious consumers seeking quality running shoes. While the ASICS model offers a comfortable fit and advanced cushioning technologies, the Brooks option justifies its higher price with additional features and branding. Buyers should weigh their preferences for brand reputation against the immediate cost savings of the ASICS shoes.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 boasts several cushioning technologies that enhance the running experience. It features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which provides a lighter, responsive ride, and AMPLIFOAM PLUS, designed for a soft and comfortable experience. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 employs DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning, designed to adapt to the runner's stride for consistent comfort. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the specific technologies each offers may appeal to different runners based on their personal preferences for cushioning style.
Upper Design and Breathability
The upper design of both running shoes plays a significant role in their performance. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability while minimizing the need for additional overlays. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 includes an engineered air mesh that also focuses on breathability and security. Both shoes effectively address ventilation; however, the choice may come down to which brand's upper design provides a better fit and feel during runs.
Performance Features
In terms of performance, each shoe brings unique features to the table. The ASICS model includes PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, aimed at creating a more responsive ride. The FLUIDRIDE outsole enhances smoother strides, making it an appealing option for runners seeking agility. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 incorporates a segmented crash pad and sculpted grooves in the heel, designed to absorb impact for smoother transitions. Both models are engineered for performance, but the ASICS may offer a slight edge in terms of cushioning innovation.
Versatility
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is described as a versatile shoe, suitable for both running and fitness routines, which may attract a broader audience. Its design aims to provide comfort regardless of the activity. The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 also emphasizes versatility, being suitable for various running surfaces thanks to its RoadTack rubber outsole, which is durable and lightweight. Both shoes serve multiple purposes, but the ASICS may cater more to those looking for an all-rounder in their athletic footwear.
Sales and Popularity
In terms of market popularity, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a sales rank of 2352, indicating it is a well-regarded option among consumers. The Brooks Women’s Trace 4, with a sales rank of 12197, suggests it is less popular in comparison. While sales rank can be indicative of consumer preference, it’s important to consider individual needs and experiences, as a lower ranking does not necessarily reflect the shoe's quality or performance.
Brand Reputation
Brand perception can influence purchasing decisions. ASICS is known for its focus on running and athletic performance, which may appeal to serious runners looking for specialized footwear. Brooks, on the other hand, has carved out a niche in the realm of comfortable running shoes. While both brands have their loyal followings, ASICS may attract those prioritizing performance features, whereas Brooks may appeal to those seeking comfort and versatility.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe ultimately depends on your personal running style and budget. The ASICS model is more cost-effective at $74.95, with advanced cushioning technologies that enhance comfort and performance, making it ideal for those who prioritize value and versatility. Conversely, the Brooks model, priced at $91.75, offers exceptional comfort with its DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning and a focus on smooth transitions, appealing to runners who prioritize brand reputation and specific performance features. Consider your running habits and preferences to make the best choice for your needs.

