vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels in adaptive stability and comfort, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers versatility and a lower price. Both are excellent choices depending on your needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better

Price

ASICS is more expensive by $10

Cushioning

ASICS focuses on softer landings

Stability

ASICS has a unique stability system

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Sales Rank

Brooks has a better sales rank

Versatility

Brooks is suitable for various activities

Fit

Brooks offers a more accommodating fit

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
85
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
90

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Kayano 31Glycerin GTS 22
Cushion TypeFF BLAST PLUS ECODNA Tuned
Support Type4D GUIDANCE SYSTEMGuideRails
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshDouble Jacquard Knit

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Brand Overview

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 both belong to well-respected brands in the running shoe industry, each offering unique features appealing to different types of runners. ASICS is known for its focus on stability and comfort, while Brooks emphasizes cushioning and support. The Gel-Kayano 31 is priced at $124.95, while the Glycerin GTS 22 is slightly cheaper at $114.95, making it about 8% less expensive.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 features innovative FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, designed to provide a cloud-like feel while maintaining breathability through its engineered mesh upper. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 utilizes DNA Tuned technology, which includes dual-size cells for a combination of plush cushioning and energetic toe-offs. Both models aim for a smooth running experience, but the Gel-Kayano 31 focuses more on a softer landing, while the Glycerin GTS 22 emphasizes a balance between cushioning and responsiveness.

Stability Features

Stability is a crucial aspect for many runners, and both shoes offer distinct features. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 incorporates the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which aims to provide adaptive stability during runs, helping users maintain a balanced stride. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 employs the GuideRails support system, designed to keep excess motion in check, ensuring that your natural motion path is supported. This makes the Glycerin GTS 22 particularly appealing for runners who require additional stabilization.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is essential in running shoes, and both models excel in this regard. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31’s engineered mesh upper improves airflow, while the knit heel pull tab facilitates easy on and off access. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 boasts a double jacquard knit upper for a flexible and accommodating fit that prioritizes durability and breathability. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the Glycerin GTS 22 offers a more adaptable fit, which might benefit runners with specific foot shapes.

Use Cases

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 is tailored for distance training, offering features that support long runs and provide excellent cushioning for extended wear. It is designed for runners looking for a supportive yet soft ride. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is versatile enough for various activities, including road running, cross-training, and gym workouts. Its innovative features make it ideal not just for running but for diverse fitness routines, appealing to a broader audience.

Visual Appeal

Aesthetically, both shoes present attractive designs that appeal to different tastes. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 is available in a Coffee/NOVA Orange color scheme, which may appeal to those who enjoy a bolder look. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, offered in a White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue palette, presents a more subtle and classic appearance. The choice between them may ultimately come down to personal style preferences, as both models are visually appealing in their own right.

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is listed at $124.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, making it about $10 cheaper. This 8% price difference may influence your decision, especially if you’re looking for solid performance at a lower cost. Additionally, the Glycerin GTS 22 has a significantly better sales rank, sitting at 2,097 compared to the Gel-Kayano 31's rank of 26,176, indicating a more favorable reception among consumers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your individual running needs and preferences. If you prioritize adaptive stability and a softer landing for distance training, the Gel-Kayano 31 may be the better choice for you. However, if you're seeking a versatile shoe that offers excellent cushioning and support for various activities, the Glycerin GTS 22 stands out as a more affordable option. With its lower price and higher sales rank, it may appeal to a wider range of runners looking for reliable performance.