ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on style and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior comfort and advanced stability features, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 provides excellent support at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Price
Glycerin GTS 22 is 26% cheaper.
Comfort
Gel-Kayano 32 features softer GEL technology.
Stability
4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM offers adaptive stability.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Support
GuideRails system helps with excess motion.
Cushioning
DNA Tuned cushioning provides responsive toe-offs.
Sales Rank
Glycerin GTS 22 has a better sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST™ PLUS | DNA Tuned |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Double jacquard knit |
| Support System | 4D GUIDANCE | GuideRails |
| Sales Rank | 3805 | 2097 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Broad platform |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 retails for $154.45, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95. This makes the Glycerin GTS 22 about 26% cheaper than the Gel-Kayano 32. If budget is a primary concern, the Brooks option offers significant savings without sacrificing essential features. Given that both shoes are positioned within the premium running shoe market, the price difference could influence a buyer’s decision, particularly for those seeking high-quality footwear at a more accessible price point.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 prioritize comfort and cushioning but use different technologies to achieve this. The Gel-Kayano 32 features FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provides a soft and responsive feel underfoot. In contrast, the Glycerin GTS 22 utilizes DNA Tuned cushioning, which blends dual-size cells for luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Gel-Kayano 32's softer GEL technology may appeal to those seeking a plush feel, while the Glycerin GTS 22 offers a balance of softness and responsiveness.
Fit and Support
When it comes to fit and support, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 includes a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM feature that provides adaptive stability during runs, catering to different foot strikes. The Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 stands out with its GuideRails support system, designed to keep excess motion in check and support natural movement. Both shoes cater to stability needs, but the Glycerin GTS 22's holistic approach might be more beneficial for runners who experience excessive motion, offering an extra layer of support to prevent injuries.
Breathability
Breathability is another critical factor for running shoes, especially in warmer conditions. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 features an engineered mesh upper that promotes airflow while reducing the need for additional overlays. Similarly, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 comes with a double jacquard knit upper that enhances breathability and flexibility. While both shoes provide excellent ventilation, the specific mesh design of the Gel-Kayano 32 may offer a slight edge in keeping feet cool during long runs, making it an attractive choice for spring and summer.
Weight and Build
Weight can significantly affect running performance, and both models are designed with this in mind. The Gel-Kayano 32 focuses on a lightweight construction with its breathable upper, which helps reduce overall shoe weight while maintaining support. The Glycerin GTS 22, while also built for comfort, emphasizes a broad platform for stability, which may add a bit of weight. Runners seeking a lighter shoe for speed work may prefer the Gel-Kayano 32, which is designed for a more streamlined feel, whereas the Glycerin GTS 22 may be better for those prioritizing stability over weight.
Style and Aesthetics
Style often plays a role in shoe selection, and both the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 offer visually appealing designs. The Gel-Kayano 32 features a unique gradient spray on its upper and midsole, embodying the colors of sunrise or sunset, appealing to those who appreciate aesthetic nuances. The Glycerin GTS 22 opts for a clean, modern look with a combination of white, limpetshell, and amparo blue, making it versatile for various outfits. Ultimately, personal preference will dictate which design resonates more with individual buyers.
Performance
In terms of performance, both shoes excel in different areas tailored to their target audiences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is ranked 3,805 in sales, indicating a solid reputation among runners seeking comfort and support for long distances. The Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22, with a better sales rank of 2,097, suggests a strong following among those looking for a shoe that combines cushioning with stability. Performance-wise, the choice between these two may depend on whether the runner prioritizes adaptive stability or prefers a more cushioned experience.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women's Glycerin GTS 22 boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you seek plush comfort with advanced stability features and are willing to invest a bit more, the Gel-Kayano 32 is an excellent choice. However, if budget is a concern and you also desire solid support and cushioning, the Glycerin GTS 22, being about 26% cheaper, offers a compelling alternative without sacrificing quality. Both shoes are exceptional in their own right, making the final decision a matter of personal priorities.

